StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Communications SDK
  5. Chat by Stream vs CometChat

Chat by Stream vs CometChat

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CometChat
CometChat
Stacks11
Followers45
Votes0
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream
Stacks18
Followers54
Votes95

Chat by Stream vs CometChat: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Chat by Stream and CometChat are two popular chat solutions for websites and applications. While both offer similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Scalability: Chat by Stream is built on a highly scalable infrastructure that can handle millions of concurrent connections without any performance issues. On the other hand, CometChat's scalability is limited, and it may struggle with handling a large number of concurrent users.

  2. Real-time Updates: Chat by Stream provides real-time updates to users, allowing them to see new messages as soon as they are sent. It uses WebSocket technology to deliver instant updates. CometChat, on the other hand, relies on Comet technology for real-time updates, which may not be as efficient or reliable as WebSocket.

  3. Integration with Existing Infrastructure: Chat by Stream seamlessly integrates with existing infrastructure and can be easily integrated into websites and applications. It provides SDKs and APIs for different platforms, making integration a breeze. CometChat also offers integration options but may require more effort and customization to fit into existing infrastructure.

  4. User Experience: Chat by Stream offers a modern and intuitive user interface with features like typing indicators, read receipts, and rich media attachments. It focuses on providing a smooth and engaging user experience. CometChat also offers a good user experience but may not have the same level of polish and modernity as Chat by Stream.

  5. Developer Friendliness: Chat by Stream offers extensive documentation, SDKs for various platforms, and a developer-friendly API, making it easier for developers to integrate and customize the chat solution. CometChat also provides documentation and APIs but may require more effort and time to get started for developers.

  6. Pricing Model: Chat by Stream offers a transparent and flexible pricing model based on the number of messages sent and received. It provides different plans to cater to different user needs. CometChat, on the other hand, has a tiered pricing model based on the number of active users, which may not be as flexible for all users.

In Summary, Chat by Stream offers scalability, real-time updates with WebSocket technology, easy integration, a great user experience, developer-friendliness, and a flexible pricing model. CometChat, while also providing similar features, may have limitations in terms of scalability, real-time updates, and developer-friendliness.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CometChat
CometChat
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream

CometChat offers a comprehensive in-app chat SDK platform that equips businesses with the tools to integrate real-time chat, voice, and video into their applications.

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

Audio chat; Text chat; Video chat; Games; Real-time translation; Screensharing; Collaboration; Whiteboard sharing; File sharing; Chatrooms; Video conference; Custom messages; Profanity filter; Data masking; Message moderation
Reactions;Threads & Replies; Presence/who is online;Fulltext search on chat messages;Messages states; Typing Indicators;Message history;Powerful query support for channels and users;AI based moderation for spam and profanity;User Roles;@mentions;User invites;Mute users;Ban users;Flag Messages;Custom Messages;React Components;Push notifications;Webhooks;Unread message counts;Multi Region support;GDPR compliancy tools;HIPAA ready;Custom Slack Style Slash commands;Highly available infrastructure with Raft replication;Giphy integration;Url enrichment;Video Playback; CDN integrated;Fast response time; On premise;Fully customizable;Powerful CLI;Unlimited message retention;99.999% uptime SLA; 24/7 phone support; SAML login; 2FA for developer accounts;Emoticons;File uploads via select, drag and drop and clipboard; React Native Components;
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
18
Followers
45
Followers
54
Votes
0
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 15
    Reasonable Pricing
  • 14
    Threads
  • 13
    Very fast and scalable
  • 13
    SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better
  • 13
    Reactions
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
React Native
React Native
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Swift
Swift
React
React
.NET
.NET
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to CometChat, Chat by Stream?

SendBird

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

ChannelizeIO

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

QuickBlox

QuickBlox

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

Layer

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community &amp; Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic &amp; fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

PopcornNotify

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope