Chat by Stream vs QuickBlox

Overview

QuickBlox

Stacks29

Followers107

Votes7

Chat by Stream

Stacks18

Followers54

Votes95

Chat by Stream vs QuickBlox: What are the differences?

Real-Time Features: Chat by Stream provides real-time features such as typing indicators, message history, and presence updates, while QuickBlox does not offer built-in real-time features.
Scalability: Chat by Stream offers scalability with the ability to handle large numbers of concurrent users and messages while QuickBlox may have limitations in handling high volumes of traffic.
Customization: Chat by Stream offers extensive customization options for the chat interface, allowing developers to tailor the chat experience to meet specific requirements, while QuickBlox may have limited customization capabilities.
Documentation and Support: Chat by Stream provides comprehensive documentation and support resources for developers, making it easier to integrate and troubleshoot the chat functionality, whereas QuickBlox documentation and support resources may be less extensive.
Data Ownership: Chat by Stream allows users to retain ownership of their data, giving them more control over their chat content, while QuickBlox may have limitations on data ownership and control.
Integration with Other Services: Chat by Stream offers seamless integration with other services and platforms, allowing for a more unified user experience, whereas QuickBlox integration capabilities may be limited.

In Summary, Chat by Stream and QuickBlox differ in real-time features, scalability, customization options, documentation and support, data ownership, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

QuickBlox	Chat by Stream
Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>	Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.
Chat/IM;User login/registration, SSO;Video Calling;Push Notifications;Voice/VOIP Calling;Content & Files;Location;Ratings;Custom objects	Reactions;Threads & Replies; Presence/who is online;Fulltext search on chat messages;Messages states; Typing Indicators;Message history;Powerful query support for channels and users;AI based moderation for spam and profanity;User Roles;@mentions;User invites;Mute users;Ban users;Flag Messages;Custom Messages;React Components;Push notifications;Webhooks;Unread message counts;Multi Region support;GDPR compliancy tools;HIPAA ready;Custom Slack Style Slash commands;Highly available infrastructure with Raft replication;Giphy integration;Url enrichment;Video Playback; CDN integrated;Fast response time; On premise;Fully customizable;Powerful CLI;Unlimited message retention;99.999% uptime SLA; 24/7 phone support; SAML login; 2FA for developer accounts;Emoticons;File uploads via select, drag and drop and clipboard; React Native Components;
Statistics
Stacks 29	Stacks 18
Followers 107	Followers 54
Votes 7	Votes 95
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Flexibility	Pros 15 Reasonable Pricing 14 Threads 13 SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better 13 Reactions 13 Very fast and scalable
Integrations
No integrations available	PHP React Native Python Ruby Swift React .NET Java

What are some alternatives to QuickBlox, Chat by Stream?

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community & Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic & fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

TeleOSS provides high-throughput SMS gateway software, SMPP/SIGTRAN support, and global messaging solutions.

Related Comparisons

Chat by Stream vs QuickBlox: What are the differences?

Real-Time Features: Chat by Stream provides real-time features such as typing indicators, message history, and presence updates, while QuickBlox does not offer built-in real-time features.
Scalability: Chat by Stream offers scalability with the ability to handle large numbers of concurrent users and messages while QuickBlox may have limitations in handling high volumes of traffic.
Customization: Chat by Stream offers extensive customization options for the chat interface, allowing developers to tailor the chat experience to meet specific requirements, while QuickBlox may have limited customization capabilities.
Documentation and Support: Chat by Stream provides comprehensive documentation and support resources for developers, making it easier to integrate and troubleshoot the chat functionality, whereas QuickBlox documentation and support resources may be less extensive.
Data Ownership: Chat by Stream allows users to retain ownership of their data, giving them more control over their chat content, while QuickBlox may have limitations on data ownership and control.
Integration with Other Services: Chat by Stream offers seamless integration with other services and platforms, allowing for a more unified user experience, whereas QuickBlox integration capabilities may be limited.

In Summary, Chat by Stream and QuickBlox differ in real-time features, scalability, customization options, documentation and support, data ownership, and integration capabilities.

Chat by Stream vs QuickBlox

Overview