StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. CImg vs OpenCV

CImg vs OpenCV

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenCV
OpenCV
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes101
CImg
CImg
Stacks1
Followers6
Votes0

CImg vs OpenCV: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here you will find the key differences between CImg and OpenCV. CImg is a C++ toolkit for image processing, while OpenCV is an open-source computer vision and machine learning software library. Both libraries have their own strengths and weaknesses, and understanding their differences can help you choose the most suitable option for your project.

  1. Capabilities: CImg is primarily focused on image processing and provides a simple interface with a limited number of functionalities. On the other hand, OpenCV is a comprehensive library that offers a wide range of computer vision algorithms, image processing techniques, and machine learning capabilities. It is well-suited for complex tasks such as object detection, recognition, and tracking.

  2. Ease of Use: CImg is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a minimalist design and provides a straightforward API for image processing tasks. OpenCV, on the other hand, has a more complex API, especially for beginners. However, it offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support, which can help users overcome the initial learning curve.

  3. Performance: OpenCV is highly optimized and designed to take advantage of hardware acceleration and parallel processing. It utilizes multi-threading and SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions to achieve fast and efficient execution. CImg, on the other hand, does not offer the same level of performance optimizations and may be slower in certain scenarios.

  4. Platform Compatibility: OpenCV is a cross-platform library that supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, and iOS. It provides pre-built binaries for easy installation on different platforms. CImg, on the other hand, is primarily targeted towards Unix-based systems and may require additional configuration for other platforms.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: OpenCV has a large and active community of developers and researchers. It has a vast ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools built on top of it, making it easier to integrate with other technologies. CImg, while also having a community, may have a smaller user base and a more limited ecosystem.

  6. License: OpenCV is released under the permissive BSD license, allowing users to freely use, modify, and distribute the library. CImg, on the other hand, is released under the less permissive CeCILL-C license, which has some restrictions on commercial and redistribution use.

In summary, CImg is a lightweight and easy-to-use library focused on image processing, while OpenCV is a comprehensive computer vision and machine learning library with extensive capabilities. OpenCV offers better performance, a wider range of functionalities, and a larger community, but may have a steeper learning curve and more complex API.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenCV
OpenCV
CImg
CImg

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

It mainly consists in a (big) single header file CImg.h providing a set of C++ classes and functions that can be used in your own sources, to load/save, manage/process and display generic images.

C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android;More than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 7 million;Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android; Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
1
Followers
1.1K
Followers
6
Votes
101
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Computer Vision
  • 18
    Open Source
  • 12
    Imaging
  • 10
    Face Detection
  • 10
    Machine Learning
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
C++
C++
Python
Python
Linux
Linux
biicode
biicode
Java
Java
Windows
Windows
Raspbian
Raspbian

What are some alternatives to OpenCV, CImg?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

GStreamer

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase