Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Clojure vs Racket: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Clojure and Racket, highlighting the key differences between the two programming languages.
Syntax: Clojure uses a Lisp-like syntax, while Racket follows a variant of Scheme. Clojure's syntax is based on S-expressions, which makes it highly expressive and concise. Racket, on the other hand, has a more conventional syntax that resembles other programming languages.
Community and Ecosystem: Clojure has a larger and more active community compared to Racket. It has a robust ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools readily available for developers. Racket, although smaller in community size, has a dedicated following and offers a rich set of libraries for specific domains like education and language processing.
Concurrency and Parallelism: Clojure provides built-in support for concurrency through its lightweight threading model and immutable data structures. It leverages the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) ecosystem to take advantage of concurrent programming libraries. Racket, on the other hand, focuses more on parallelism through its support for thread-based concurrency and message passing.
Purpose and Focus: Clojure is primarily designed for building scalable, concurrent, and distributed systems. It aims to tackle the challenges of multi-core processors and distributed computing. Racket, on the other hand, focuses on language-oriented programming and provides a powerful environment for language research and development.
Metaprogramming: Clojure provides a powerful metaprogramming facility called macros, which allows developers to extend the language itself. This enables the creation of domain-specific languages and advanced code transformations. Racket, being a language-oriented programming environment, excels in metaprogramming capabilities, offering features like first-class macros and syntactic abstraction.
Tooling and Development Experience: Clojure benefits from the mature tooling ecosystem of the JVM, with IDE support, build tools, and debugging capabilities. Its REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) provides a fast feedback loop for interactive development. Racket, on the other hand, offers a highly integrated development environment (IDE) called DrRacket, which provides a seamless coding experience and interactive debugging tools.
In summary, Clojure and Racket differ in terms of syntax, community and ecosystem, concurrency and parallelism approaches, purpose and focus, metaprogramming capabilities, and tooling and development experience.
Pros of Clojure
- It is a lisp117
- Persistent data structures100
- Concise syntax100
- jvm-based language90
- Concurrency89
- Interactive repl81
- Code is data76
- Open source61
- Lazy data structures61
- Macros57
- Functional49
- Simplistic23
- Immutable by default22
- Excellent collections20
- Fast-growing community19
- Multiple host languages15
- Simple (not easy!)15
- Practical Lisp15
- Because it's really fun to use10
- Addictive10
- Community9
- Web friendly9
- Rapid development9
- It creates Reusable code9
- Minimalist8
- Programmable programming language6
- Java interop6
- Regained interest in programming5
- Compiles to JavaScript4
- Share a lot of code with clojurescript/use on frontend3
- EDN3
- Clojurescript1
Pros of Racket
- Meta-programming4
- Hygienic macros3
- FFI2
- Great libraries2
- Beautiful code2
- Rapid development2
- Fast2
- Gradual typing2
- Nanopass compiler2
- Extensible2
- Racket Macro system2
- Cross platform GUI2
- Module system2
- Macro Stepper2
- Beginner friendly2
- Built-in concurrency2
- Built-in parallelism2
- Functional Programming2
- Open source2
- Language-oriented programming2
- Pattern matching2
- Easy syntax1
- Type inference1
- Static type-checker1
- Racketscript1
- Great community1
- IDE1
- Typed Racket1
- Good documentation1
- Efficient compiler1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Clojure
- Cryptic stacktraces11
- Need to wrap basically every java lib5
- Toxic community4
- Good code heavily relies on local conventions3
- Tonns of abandonware3
- Slow application startup3
- Usable only with REPL1
- Hiring issues1
- It's a lisp1
- Bad documented libs1
- Macros are overused by devs1
- Tricky profiling1
- IDE with high learning curve1
- Configuration bolierplate1
- Conservative community1
- Have no good and fast fmt0
Cons of Racket
- LISP BASED2
- No GitHub2