Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Clojure

1.9K
1.4K
+ 1
1.1K
Racket

89
83
+ 1
54
Add tool

Clojure vs Racket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Clojure and Racket, highlighting the key differences between the two programming languages.

  1. Syntax: Clojure uses a Lisp-like syntax, while Racket follows a variant of Scheme. Clojure's syntax is based on S-expressions, which makes it highly expressive and concise. Racket, on the other hand, has a more conventional syntax that resembles other programming languages.

  2. Community and Ecosystem: Clojure has a larger and more active community compared to Racket. It has a robust ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools readily available for developers. Racket, although smaller in community size, has a dedicated following and offers a rich set of libraries for specific domains like education and language processing.

  3. Concurrency and Parallelism: Clojure provides built-in support for concurrency through its lightweight threading model and immutable data structures. It leverages the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) ecosystem to take advantage of concurrent programming libraries. Racket, on the other hand, focuses more on parallelism through its support for thread-based concurrency and message passing.

  4. Purpose and Focus: Clojure is primarily designed for building scalable, concurrent, and distributed systems. It aims to tackle the challenges of multi-core processors and distributed computing. Racket, on the other hand, focuses on language-oriented programming and provides a powerful environment for language research and development.

  5. Metaprogramming: Clojure provides a powerful metaprogramming facility called macros, which allows developers to extend the language itself. This enables the creation of domain-specific languages and advanced code transformations. Racket, being a language-oriented programming environment, excels in metaprogramming capabilities, offering features like first-class macros and syntactic abstraction.

  6. Tooling and Development Experience: Clojure benefits from the mature tooling ecosystem of the JVM, with IDE support, build tools, and debugging capabilities. Its REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) provides a fast feedback loop for interactive development. Racket, on the other hand, offers a highly integrated development environment (IDE) called DrRacket, which provides a seamless coding experience and interactive debugging tools.

In summary, Clojure and Racket differ in terms of syntax, community and ecosystem, concurrency and parallelism approaches, purpose and focus, metaprogramming capabilities, and tooling and development experience.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Clojure
Pros of Racket
  • 117
    It is a lisp
  • 100
    Persistent data structures
  • 100
    Concise syntax
  • 90
    jvm-based language
  • 89
    Concurrency
  • 81
    Interactive repl
  • 76
    Code is data
  • 61
    Open source
  • 61
    Lazy data structures
  • 57
    Macros
  • 49
    Functional
  • 23
    Simplistic
  • 22
    Immutable by default
  • 20
    Excellent collections
  • 19
    Fast-growing community
  • 15
    Multiple host languages
  • 15
    Simple (not easy!)
  • 15
    Practical Lisp
  • 10
    Because it's really fun to use
  • 10
    Addictive
  • 9
    Community
  • 9
    Web friendly
  • 9
    Rapid development
  • 9
    It creates Reusable code
  • 8
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Programmable programming language
  • 6
    Java interop
  • 5
    Regained interest in programming
  • 4
    Compiles to JavaScript
  • 3
    Share a lot of code with clojurescript/use on frontend
  • 3
    EDN
  • 1
    Clojurescript
  • 4
    Meta-programming
  • 3
    Hygienic macros
  • 2
    FFI
  • 2
    Great libraries
  • 2
    Beautiful code
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Gradual typing
  • 2
    Nanopass compiler
  • 2
    Extensible
  • 2
    Racket Macro system
  • 2
    Cross platform GUI
  • 2
    Module system
  • 2
    Macro Stepper
  • 2
    Beginner friendly
  • 2
    Built-in concurrency
  • 2
    Built-in parallelism
  • 2
    Functional Programming
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Language-oriented programming
  • 2
    Pattern matching
  • 1
    Easy syntax
  • 1
    Type inference
  • 1
    Static type-checker
  • 1
    Racketscript
  • 1
    Great community
  • 1
    IDE
  • 1
    Typed Racket
  • 1
    Good documentation
  • 1
    Efficient compiler

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Clojure
Cons of Racket
  • 11
    Cryptic stacktraces
  • 5
    Need to wrap basically every java lib
  • 4
    Toxic community
  • 3
    Good code heavily relies on local conventions
  • 3
    Tonns of abandonware
  • 3
    Slow application startup
  • 1
    Usable only with REPL
  • 1
    Hiring issues
  • 1
    It's a lisp
  • 1
    Bad documented libs
  • 1
    Macros are overused by devs
  • 1
    Tricky profiling
  • 1
    IDE with high learning curve
  • 1
    Configuration bolierplate
  • 1
    Conservative community
  • 0
    Have no good and fast fmt
  • 2
    LISP BASED
  • 2
    No GitHub

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

1.6K
7K
17.7K
2.9K
5.8K
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Clojure?

Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.

What is Racket?

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Clojure?
What companies use Racket?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Clojure?
What tools integrate with Racket?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitGitHubPython+22
17
14343
GitGitHubDocker+34
29
42816
What are some alternatives to Clojure and Racket?
Scala
Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.
Haskell
It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.
Common Lisp
Lisp was originally created as a practical mathematical notation for computer programs, influenced by the notation of Alonzo Church's lambda calculus. It quickly became the favored programming language for artificial intelligence (AI) research. As one of the earliest programming languages, Lisp pioneered many ideas in computer science, including tree data structures, automatic storage management, dynamic typing, conditionals, higher-order functions, recursion, and the self-hosting compiler. [source: wikipedia]
Elixir
Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.
Julia
Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.
See all alternatives