StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Clojure vs Racket

Clojure vs Racket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Clojure
Clojure
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.4K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars10.7K
Forks1.5K
Racket
Racket
Stacks92
Followers83
Votes54

Clojure vs Racket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Clojure and Racket, highlighting the key differences between the two programming languages.

  1. Syntax: Clojure uses a Lisp-like syntax, while Racket follows a variant of Scheme. Clojure's syntax is based on S-expressions, which makes it highly expressive and concise. Racket, on the other hand, has a more conventional syntax that resembles other programming languages.

  2. Community and Ecosystem: Clojure has a larger and more active community compared to Racket. It has a robust ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools readily available for developers. Racket, although smaller in community size, has a dedicated following and offers a rich set of libraries for specific domains like education and language processing.

  3. Concurrency and Parallelism: Clojure provides built-in support for concurrency through its lightweight threading model and immutable data structures. It leverages the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) ecosystem to take advantage of concurrent programming libraries. Racket, on the other hand, focuses more on parallelism through its support for thread-based concurrency and message passing.

  4. Purpose and Focus: Clojure is primarily designed for building scalable, concurrent, and distributed systems. It aims to tackle the challenges of multi-core processors and distributed computing. Racket, on the other hand, focuses on language-oriented programming and provides a powerful environment for language research and development.

  5. Metaprogramming: Clojure provides a powerful metaprogramming facility called macros, which allows developers to extend the language itself. This enables the creation of domain-specific languages and advanced code transformations. Racket, being a language-oriented programming environment, excels in metaprogramming capabilities, offering features like first-class macros and syntactic abstraction.

  6. Tooling and Development Experience: Clojure benefits from the mature tooling ecosystem of the JVM, with IDE support, build tools, and debugging capabilities. Its REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) provides a fast feedback loop for interactive development. Racket, on the other hand, offers a highly integrated development environment (IDE) called DrRacket, which provides a seamless coding experience and interactive debugging tools.

In summary, Clojure and Racket differ in terms of syntax, community and ecosystem, concurrency and parallelism approaches, purpose and focus, metaprogramming capabilities, and tooling and development experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Clojure
Clojure
Racket
Racket

Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

-
Multi-paradigm; Object-oriented;Cross-platform;Powerful macros & languages;DrRacket IDE & tons of documentation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
92
Followers
1.4K
Followers
83
Votes
1.1K
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 118
    It is a lisp
  • 101
    Concise syntax
  • 100
    Persistent data structures
  • 90
    jvm-based language
  • 89
    Concurrency
Cons
  • 11
    Cryptic stacktraces
  • 5
    Need to wrap basically every java lib
  • 4
    Toxic community
  • 3
    Slow application startup
  • 3
    Tonns of abandonware
Pros
  • 4
    Meta-programming
  • 3
    Hygienic macros
  • 2
    Macro Stepper
  • 2
    Extensible
  • 2
    Cross platform GUI
Cons
  • 2
    No GitHub
  • 2
    LISP BASED
Integrations
Java
Java
Windows
Windows
Oracle
Oracle
MySQL
MySQL
Cassandra
Cassandra
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Linux
Linux
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
SQLite
SQLite
macOS
macOS
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server

What are some alternatives to Clojure, Racket?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot