StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. CloudCannon vs Netlify

CloudCannon vs Netlify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netlify
Netlify
Stacks3.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes207
CloudCannon
CloudCannon
Stacks10
Followers19
Votes0

CloudCannon vs Netlify: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Options: CloudCannon and Netlify both offer convenient deployment options for websites, but they differ in their approach. CloudCannon allows users to deploy their website to any hosting provider, giving them flexibility and control over where their site is hosted. On the other hand, Netlify is an all-in-one platform that not only provides hosting but also builds and deploys websites automatically. This can be advantageous for those who prefer a streamlined and hassle-free deployment process.

  2. Build Process: When it comes to building websites, CloudCannon and Netlify have different approaches. CloudCannon provides a visual editor with a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for non-technical users to build and manage websites. Netlify, on the other hand, uses a command-line interface (CLI) and Git-based workflow, which is better suited for developers who are familiar with these tools. This difference in build process caters to different types of users and their level of technical expertise.

  3. Content Management: Both CloudCannon and Netlify offer content management capabilities, but they differ in their approach to managing content. CloudCannon provides a visual editor that allows users to easily create and edit content directly on the website. Netlify, on the other hand, integrates with popular headless CMS platforms, allowing users to manage their content separately from the website. This gives users the flexibility to choose their preferred CMS and seamlessly integrate it with their website.

  4. Workflow Automation: Netlify stands out when it comes to workflow automation. It offers a range of powerful automation features such as continuous deployment, form handling, webhook integrations, and more. This allows developers to automate repetitive tasks and streamline their workflow. CloudCannon, while offering deployment options, does not have the same level of built-in workflow automation features as Netlify.

  5. Customizability: CloudCannon and Netlify differ in terms of customizability. CloudCannon offers a more opinionated approach, providing templates and themes that users can choose from to quickly build their website. While this can be convenient for those who prefer a straightforward setup, it may limit the flexibility for more advanced customization. Netlify, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and control, allowing users to customize their build process, deployment settings, and integrations to suit their specific requirements.

  6. Pricing Model: The pricing models of CloudCannon and Netlify also differ. CloudCannon offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of editors and websites, making it suitable for small to medium-sized teams or agencies. Netlify, on the other hand, offers a freemium model with additional paid features for enterprise users. This difference in pricing models allows users to choose the option that best fits their budget and requirements.

In Summary, CloudCannon provides deployment flexibility and a visual editor, while Netlify offers an all-in-one platform with automated workflows, greater customizability, and integration with headless CMS platforms. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the user, their technical expertise, and the level of control they require.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Netlify, CloudCannon

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Netlify
Netlify
CloudCannon
CloudCannon

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

CloudCannon is the fast, intuitive solution for your Jekyll needs. Build, update, and deliver content to your customers.

Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket
Blogging; CDN; Authentication; Internationalisation; White Labeling; Environments; Visual editing
Statistics
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
10
Followers
2.1K
Followers
19
Votes
207
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 23
    Free SSL support
  • 23
    Super simple deploys
  • 16
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
Cons
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Hugo
Hugo
Zapier
Zapier
Dropbox
Dropbox
Tray.io
Tray.io
Gridsome
Gridsome
jekyll
jekyll

What are some alternatives to Netlify, CloudCannon?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Sanity

Sanity

Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN.

Contentful

Contentful

With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Tipe

Tipe

All your Apps have text and your developers don't want to manage it. Create and manage your text or assets with powerful editing tools and access it from anywhere with a GraphQL or REST API.

prismic.io

prismic.io

Prismic is a Content Management System, a tool for editing online content, also known as a headless CMS, an API CMS, a content platform, a disruptive content-as-a-service digital experience.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope