Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs Dropwizard: What are the differences?
What is Cocoa Touch (iOS)? The Cocoa Touch collection of frameworks includes everything needed to create iOS apps. The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services.
What is Dropwizard? Java framework for developing ops-friendly, high-performance, RESTful web services. Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.
Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Dropwizard belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.
"Backed by Apple" is the top reason why over 5 developers like Cocoa Touch (iOS), while over 23 developers mention "Quick and easy to get a new http service going" as the leading cause for choosing Dropwizard.
Dropwizard is an open source tool with 7.25K GitHub stars and 3.04K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Dropwizard's open source repository on GitHub.
Yammer, Opower, and ClassPass are some of the popular companies that use Dropwizard, whereas Cocoa Touch (iOS) is used by Apple, Snapchat, and Third Iron. Dropwizard has a broader approval, being mentioned in 51 company stacks & 12 developers stacks; compared to Cocoa Touch (iOS), which is listed in 32 company stacks and 19 developer stacks.
What is Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
What is Dropwizard?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
When we first built the ArifZefen app our focus was around validating our business assumptions and finding a good product fit. Once we got to a few thousand users, it became clear that we needed to make quality a priority and that meant we needed a reliable tool that will allow us to monitor the health of our app. Crashlytics (now Fabric by Twitter ) was on a short list of solutions we closely explored and we were very happy with its ease of integration and the consistency it brought to our Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Android SDK crash monitoring.
Its daily pulse emails were also super informative in giving us a good sense of how each platform was doing in terms of crash-free and new users, daily actives and other relevant session data. These emails also surfaced any anomalies in daily trends, alerting us of any reason for concern. Overall, Crashlytics was instrumental in allowing us to quickly discover and diagnose crashes and it is one of the main reasons we were able to keep our app store ratings reasonable high. But perhaps even more importantly, we were able to set a high quality bar for our users that absent Crashlytics would have been difficult to maintain.