StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Codacy vs Snyk

Codacy vs Snyk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codacy
Codacy
Stacks313
Followers551
Votes248
Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20

Codacy vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction: Codacy and Snyk are both popular tools in the software development industry that help developers improve code quality and security. Despite sharing similar goals, these two tools have key differences that set them apart.

1. Integration with Version Control Systems: Codacy integrates with a wide range of Version Control Systems, including GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing developers with seamless code quality monitoring within their existing workflow. On the other hand, Snyk primarily focuses on integrating with npm and GitHub for vulnerability scanning and dependencies management.

2. Code Quality vs. Security Focus: While Codacy offers robust code quality analysis features, including code pattern recognition and automatic code reviews, Snyk is more focused on security, offering vulnerability scanning, license compliance monitoring, and dependency security checks to help developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their codebase.

3. Language Support: Codacy supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and PHP, making it versatile for various development stacks. In contrast, Snyk has a more limited language support, with a primary focus on JavaScript and Node.js projects.

4. Pricing Model: Codacy offers a variety of pricing plans based on the size of the team and specific features required, making it suitable for both individual developers and large enterprises. Meanwhile, Snyk follows a freemium model, providing basic functionality for free and charging for advanced features and premium support.

5. Community and Ecosystem: Codacy has a strong community and ecosystem of plugins and integrations, allowing developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, Snyk also has a growing community but focuses more on partnerships with other security vendors and tools to enhance its security offerings.

6. Deployment Options: Codacy offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, giving developers flexibility in choosing how they want to manage their code quality monitoring. Snyk, on the other hand, is primarily cloud-based, with limited self-hosting options available for enterprise customers.

In Summary, Codacy and Snyk differ in their integration options, focus on code quality vs. security, language support, pricing models, community engagement, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Codacy, Snyk

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codacy
Codacy
Snyk
Snyk

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Available for cloud and self-hosted repositories;Static code analysis for +40 languages;Analysis for cloud infrastructure-as-code frameworks;Automatic analysis integrated in your CI;Code coverage tracking;Support for linter configuration files;1-click autofixes for GitHub;Static IP addresses for allowlisting Codacy;
-
Statistics
Stacks
313
Stacks
580
Followers
551
Followers
380
Votes
248
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Automated code review
  • 35
    Easy setup
  • 29
    Free for open source
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 18
    Helps reduce technical debt
Cons
  • 6
    No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    No malware detection
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Codacy, Snyk?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana