Code Climate vs DeepSource Analyzer

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

DeepSource

Stacks16

Followers49

Votes8

Code Climate vs DeepSource Analyzer: What are the differences?

Programming Languages Supported: Code Climate supports various programming languages such as Ruby, JavaScript, Python, and Java, while DeepSource Analyzer primarily focuses on Python and Go languages. For projects written in other languages, Code Climate would be the preferred choice due to its wider language support.
Scope of Issues Detected: Code Climate focuses more on code quality and maintainability issues like Duplication, Complexity, Security Vulnerabilities, and Style Violations. On the other hand, DeepSource Analyzer primarily aims to identify code issues related to Security, Performance, and Style Violations. Depending on the project requirements, users can choose the tool that best aligns with their specific needs.
Integration with Version Control Systems: Code Climate integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, extracting and analyzing code directly from repositories. In contrast, DeepSource Analyzer also offers Git integration but provides additional support for other version control systems like Mercurial. Depending on the version control system used by the project, this difference may influence the choice between the two tools.
Pricing Model: Code Climate primarily offers a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the number of repositories and users. DeepSource Analyzer, on the other hand, offers a free tier for open-source projects and a paid subscription for private repositories. Depending on the project budget and size, the pricing model of each tool may play a significant role in decision-making.
Custom Rules and Configurations: Code Climate allows users to define custom rules and configurations to tailor the analysis process to specific project requirements. DeepSource Analyzer, on the other hand, provides pre-configured rules and configurations, limiting the extent of customization available. Depending on the level of flexibility required in setting up analysis rules, users can choose between the two tools accordingly.
Support for Third-Party Integrations: Code Climate offers extensive support for third-party integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, Trello, and many others, enhancing collaboration and workflow efficiency. DeepSource Analyzer also provides integrations but may have a more limited range compared to Code Climate. Depending on the existing toolset and workflow of a project, the availability of third-party integrations may be a crucial factor in choosing between the two tools.

In Summary, the key differences between Code Climate and DeepSource Analyzer lie in programming language support, scope of detected issues, integration with version control systems, pricing model, custom rules and configurations, and support for third-party integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	DeepSource
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
Stacks 740	Stacks 16
Followers 497	Followers 49
Votes 285	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	Pros 3 Easy setup and analysis 3 Free for open source 2 Autofixes for many lints for free Cons 1 Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	Ruby Java C# Terraform Docker Scala GitHub JavaScript GitLab Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, DeepSource?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Code Climate vs DeepSource Analyzer: What are the differences?

Programming Languages Supported: Code Climate supports various programming languages such as Ruby, JavaScript, Python, and Java, while DeepSource Analyzer primarily focuses on Python and Go languages. For projects written in other languages, Code Climate would be the preferred choice due to its wider language support.
Scope of Issues Detected: Code Climate focuses more on code quality and maintainability issues like Duplication, Complexity, Security Vulnerabilities, and Style Violations. On the other hand, DeepSource Analyzer primarily aims to identify code issues related to Security, Performance, and Style Violations. Depending on the project requirements, users can choose the tool that best aligns with their specific needs.
Integration with Version Control Systems: Code Climate integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, extracting and analyzing code directly from repositories. In contrast, DeepSource Analyzer also offers Git integration but provides additional support for other version control systems like Mercurial. Depending on the version control system used by the project, this difference may influence the choice between the two tools.
Pricing Model: Code Climate primarily offers a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the number of repositories and users. DeepSource Analyzer, on the other hand, offers a free tier for open-source projects and a paid subscription for private repositories. Depending on the project budget and size, the pricing model of each tool may play a significant role in decision-making.
Custom Rules and Configurations: Code Climate allows users to define custom rules and configurations to tailor the analysis process to specific project requirements. DeepSource Analyzer, on the other hand, provides pre-configured rules and configurations, limiting the extent of customization available. Depending on the level of flexibility required in setting up analysis rules, users can choose between the two tools accordingly.
Support for Third-Party Integrations: Code Climate offers extensive support for third-party integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, Trello, and many others, enhancing collaboration and workflow efficiency. DeepSource Analyzer also provides integrations but may have a more limited range compared to Code Climate. Depending on the existing toolset and workflow of a project, the availability of third-party integrations may be a crucial factor in choosing between the two tools.

Code Climate vs DeepSource Analyzer

Overview