1. Key Integration and Automation: Veracode offers more extensive integrations with development tools and automation, allowing for streamlined and efficient security testing processes. On the other hand, Code Inspector may have limited integrations and automation capabilities.

2. Scalability and Enterprise Support: Veracode is often preferred by larger enterprises due to its scalability and robust support services. Code Inspector may be more suitable for smaller organizations or individual developers who do not require extensive enterprise-level features and support.

3. Reporting and Analytics: Veracode provides in-depth reporting and analytics features that offer detailed insights into security testing results and trends. Code Inspector may have basic reporting capabilities, but they might not be as comprehensive or customizable as Veracode's.

4. Type of Security Testing: Veracode typically offers a wider range of security testing options, including static, dynamic, and software composition analysis. In contrast, Code Inspector may focus more on specific types of security testing, like static analysis, which could limit the overall security coverage.

5. API and Customization: Veracode often provides robust APIs and customization options that allow users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and workflows. Code Inspector might have limited API access and customization capabilities, making it less flexible for organizations with unique requirements.

6. Cost and Pricing Structure: Veracode's pricing structure may be more complex and geared towards larger enterprises with specific security requirements. Code Inspector might offer simpler and more affordable pricing models, making it a more cost-effective solution for smaller organizations or individual users.

In Summary, Veracode and Code Inspector differ in integration capabilities, scalability, reporting features, types of security testing, customization options, and pricing structures.