Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
CodeFactor.io vs Codecov: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
- Integration with VCS Platforms: CodeFactor.io integrates with GitLab, GitHub, and Bitbucket, while Codecov supports integration with additional platforms like Azure DevOps and Google Cloud Source Repositories.
- Languages and Frameworks Supported: CodeFactor.io mainly focuses on Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Go, whereas Codecov provides support for a wider range of programming languages and frameworks, including Java, Ruby, and PHP.
- Code Coverage Metrics: Codecov provides detailed code coverage reports with insights into uncovered lines and branches, while CodeFactor.io emphasizes on code quality analysis and offers recommendations for improvement.
- Pricing Structure: CodeFactor.io offers a free tier for open-source projects with paid plans based on the number of repositories, while Codecov provides a free tier for public repositories and charges based on usage for private repositories.
- Community and Support: Codecov has a larger community of users and contributors, resulting in more extensive documentation and community support, whereas CodeFactor.io has a smaller but dedicated user base with personalized customer support.
- Integration with CI/CD Tools: Codecov seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and Travis CI, while CodeFactor.io has more limited integration options with CI/CD platforms.
In Summary, CodeFactor.io and Codecov differ in their VCS platform integrations, language support, code coverage metrics, pricing structure, community support, and integration with CI/CD tools.
Decisions about Codecov and CodeFactor.io
Felipe Lincoln
My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Codecov
Pros of CodeFactor.io
Pros of Codecov
- More stable than coveralls17
- Easy setup17
- GitHub integration14
- They reply their users11
- Easy setup,great ui10
- Easily see per-commit coverage in GitHub5
- Steve is the man5
- Merges coverage from multiple CI jobs4
- Golang support4
- Free for public repositories3
- Code coverage3
- JSON in web hook3
- Newest Android SDK preinstalled3
- Cool diagrams2
- Bitbucket Integration1
Pros of CodeFactor.io
- Easy setup & GitHub integration8
- Github integration7
- Easy setup5
- Free for open source5
- Helps reduce technical debt3
- Insures that code meets quality standards3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Codecov
Cons of CodeFactor.io
Cons of Codecov
- GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight1
- Delayed results by hours since recent outage0
- Support does not respond to email0
Cons of CodeFactor.io
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
No Stats
What is Codecov?
Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
What is CodeFactor.io?
CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Codecov?
What companies use CodeFactor.io?
What companies use Codecov?
What companies use CodeFactor.io?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Codecov?
What tools integrate with CodeFactor.io?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17 16
7047
What are some alternatives to Codecov and CodeFactor.io?
Code Climate
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Coveralls
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
SonarQube
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
Codacy
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.
JaCoCo
It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.