Coveralls vs Codecov vs uberalls Comparison | StackShare

Overview

Coveralls

Stacks1.4K

Followers278

Votes68

Codecov

Stacks2.4K

Followers324

Votes102

uberalls

Stacks36

Followers62

Votes0

GitHub Stars186

Forks14

Advice on Coveralls, Codecov, uberalls

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container. Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website. This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coveralls	Codecov	uberalls
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.	Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.	Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.
Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview	Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 186
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 14
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 36
Followers 278	Followers 324	Followers 62
Votes 68	Votes 102	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 45 Free for public repositories 13 Code coverage 7 Ease of integration 2 More stable than Codecov 1 Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs	Pros 17 Easy setup 17 More stable than coveralls 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Support does not respond to email 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Travis CI CircleCI Semaphore Jenkins Codeship	HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitLab GitHub CircleCI Heroku	Jenkins Phabricator

What are some alternatives to Coveralls, Codecov, uberalls?

Istanbul

It is a JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.