StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Coverage
  4. Code Coverage
  5. Codecov vs Coveralls vs uberalls

Codecov vs Coveralls vs uberalls

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coveralls
Coveralls
Stacks1.7K
Followers278
Votes68
Codecov
Codecov
Stacks2.8K
Followers324
Votes102
uberalls
uberalls
Stacks36
Followers62
Votes0
GitHub Stars186
Forks14

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Coveralls, Codecov, uberalls

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coveralls
Coveralls
Codecov
Codecov
uberalls
uberalls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.

Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
186
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
14
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
36
Followers
278
Followers
324
Followers
62
Votes
68
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Free for public repositories
  • 13
    Code coverage
  • 7
    Ease of integration
  • 2
    More stable than Codecov
  • 1
    Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
Pros
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
Cons
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
Semaphore
Semaphore
Jenkins
Jenkins
Codeship
Codeship
HipChat
HipChat
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Heroku
Heroku
Jenkins
Jenkins
Phabricator
Phabricator

What are some alternatives to Coveralls, Codecov, uberalls?

Istanbul

Istanbul

It is a JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana