Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Codecov

2.4K
322
+ 1
102
SonarQube

1.7K
2K
+ 1
52
Add tool

Codecov vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Codecov and SonarQube, two popular tools used for code quality analysis. These differences will help you understand which tool best suits your requirements.

  1. Code Coverage Analysis: Codecov primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, which measures the extent to which the source code is tested by identifying which parts of the code are executed during test cases. It provides detailed reports and insights into the code coverage, helping developers identify areas of their code that require further testing. On the other hand, SonarQube offers code coverage analysis as one of its features but also provides a wide range of other code quality analysis capabilities.

  2. Static Code Analysis: SonarQube specializes in static code analysis, which is the process of analyzing the code without executing it. It uses a set of predefined rules to detect bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells in the codebase. SonarQube provides comprehensive reports on code issues, which enables developers to identify and fix potential problems before they become critical. Codecov, on the other hand, does not offer the same level of static code analysis capabilities as SonarQube.

  3. Integration with Continuous Integration (CI) Tools: Codecov seamlessly integrates with popular CI tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, allowing developers to incorporate code coverage analysis into their existing CI workflows. This integration enables automatic generation of code coverage reports and provides visibility into the coverage trends over time. SonarQube also integrates with CI tools but goes beyond code coverage analysis by providing overall code quality analysis.

  4. Language Support: Codecov supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like Java, Python, JavaScript, and Ruby. It provides language-specific plugins and libraries to easily integrate with different development environments and frameworks. SonarQube also supports a wide variety of programming languages, making it suitable for projects with diverse language requirements.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: SonarQube has a large and active community of users and contributors, which ensures continuous development and improvement of the tool. The community constantly updates and maintains various plugins and extensions, allowing users to enhance the functionality and customization options of SonarQube. Codecov also has a community of users, but it may not be as extensive as SonarQube's community.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Codecov offers both free and paid plans based on the size and needs of the organization. The free plan provides basic coverage analysis features, while the paid plans offer additional advanced features and support options. SonarQube also offers a free community edition that provides comprehensive code quality analysis capabilities. However, it also offers paid editions with additional features and support, making it suitable for organizations with specific requirements.

In summary, Codecov primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, while SonarQube specializes in static code analysis along with a wide range of other code quality analysis capabilities. Codecov has stronger integration with CI tools, supports multiple programming languages, but may have a smaller community compared to SonarQube. Additionally, Codecov offers both free and paid plans, whereas SonarQube offers a free community edition with paid editions available as well.

Decisions about Codecov and SonarQube

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container. Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website. This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Codecov
Pros of SonarQube
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
  • 5
    Easily see per-commit coverage in GitHub
  • 5
    Steve is the man
  • 4
    Merges coverage from multiple CI jobs
  • 4
    Golang support
  • 3
    Free for public repositories
  • 3
    Code coverage
  • 3
    JSON in web hook
  • 3
    Newest Android SDK preinstalled
  • 2
    Cool diagrams
  • 1
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 1
    Difficult to deploy

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Codecov
Cons of SonarQube
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Codecov?

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

What is SonarQube?

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Codecov?
What companies use SonarQube?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Codecov?
What tools integrate with SonarQube?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Codecov and SonarQube?
Code Climate
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Coveralls
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
Codacy
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.
JaCoCo
It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
See all alternatives