Codecov vs SonarQube

Codecov

351
231
+ 1
78
SonarQube

926
954
+ 1
26
Add tool

Codecov vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Codecov: Hosted coverage reports with awesome features to enhance your CI workflow. Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security; SonarQube: Continuous Code Quality. SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Codecov belongs to "Code Coverage" category of the tech stack, while SonarQube can be primarily classified under "Code Review".

"More stable than coveralls" is the primary reason why developers consider Codecov over the competitors, whereas "Tracks code complexity and smell trends" was stated as the key factor in picking SonarQube.

SonarQube is an open source tool with 3.79K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to SonarQube's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, SonarQube has a broader approval, being mentioned in 105 company stacks & 61 developers stacks; compared to Codecov, which is listed in 49 company stacks and 29 developer stacks.

Decisions about Codecov and SonarQube

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container. Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website. This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

See more
Pros of Codecov
Pros of SonarQube

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Codecov
Cons of SonarQube

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Codecov?

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

What is SonarQube?

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
What companies use Codecov?
What companies use SonarQube?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Codecov?
What tools integrate with SonarQube?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Codecov and SonarQube?
Code Climate
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Coveralls
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
Codacy
Codacy automates code reviews to improve and standardize code quality across large enterprises. It identifies issues through static code analysis. Integrates with GitLab, GitHub & Bitbucket.
JaCoCo
It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.
uberalls
Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.
See all alternatives
Interest over time