Code Climate vs ESLint vs SonarQube

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Code Climate

732
494
+ 1
285
ESLint

36.3K
13.3K
+ 1
28
SonarQube

1.7K
2K
+ 1
52

Code Climate vs ESLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown document will compare the key differences between Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube.

1. **Integration with IDEs**: Code Climate offers seamless integration with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ IDEA, providing real-time feedback to developers within their coding environment. On the other hand, ESLint and SonarQube typically require setting up separate configurations or plugins within the IDEs for code analysis.

2. **Focus on Language Support**: ESLint is a JavaScript-specific linter, focusing solely on analyzing and identifying issues in JavaScript code. In contrast, Code Climate and SonarQube support a broader range of programming languages, making them suitable for multi-language projects where consistent code quality checks are needed across different languages.

3. **Pricing Model**: Code Climate follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering different tiered plans based on the size and needs of the organization. ESLint, on the other hand, is an open-source tool available for free with community support. SonarQube also offers a free Community Edition but requires a license for additional features and support in the Enterprise Edition.

4. **Rule Customization**: ESLint allows developers to customize rules or create their own rules using JavaScript, providing flexibility in defining code quality standards based on specific project requirements. Code Climate and SonarQube have predefined rule sets that may be customizable to some extent but may not offer the same level of fine-grained rule customization as ESLint.

5. **Parallel Analysis**: Code Climate is known for its parallel analysis capabilities, allowing for faster code reviews and analysis of large codebases by distributing the workload across multiple processors or machines. While SonarQube also supports parallel analysis for certain languages, ESLint does not have native support for parallel analysis, potentially leading to slower analysis times for extensive codebases.

6. **Community Support**: ESLint benefits from a vast and active community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, ensuring continuous improvements, updates, and support. Code Climate and SonarQube also have active user communities, but ESLint's community-driven development model may provide more immediate access to new features and enhancements through community plugins and extensions.

In Summary, Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube differ in terms of integration with IDEs, language support, pricing models, rule customization, parallel analysis capabilities, and community support.
Advice on Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube
Needs advice
on
ESLintESLintSass Lint Sass Lint
and
StylelintStylelint

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

See more
Replies (3)
Amaro Mariño
Senior Frontend Developer at Landbot.io · | 6 upvotes · 149.1K views
Recommends
on
ESLintESLint

In the case of .js files I would recommend using both Eslint and Prettier.

You can set up Prettier as an Eslint rule using the following plugin:

https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier

And in order to avoid conflicts between Prettier and Eslint, you can use this config:

https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier

Which turns off all Eslint rules that are unnecessary or might conflict with Prettier.

See more
Alex Spieslechner

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this: - eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support - eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it) - vscode workspace config: format on save - separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting - precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

See more
Alexis Villegas Torres
Software Engineer at SpeedUrWeb · | 5 upvotes · 148.8K views
Recommends
on
StylelintStylelint

Pura vida! Well, I had a similar issue and at the end I decided to use Stylelint + Prettier for that job, in our case, we wanted that our linting process includes the SCSS files and not only the JS file, base on that we concluded that using only ESLint to do both things wasn't the best option, so, we integrated prettier with Stylelint, and for that we used a neat plugin that allowed us to use Prettier inside Stylelint here is the link, https://github.com/prettier/stylelint-prettier#recommended-configuration, I hope that this can help you, hasta pronto!, :)

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Code Climate
Pros of ESLint
Pros of SonarQube
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
  • 15
    Continued encouragement to a have better / cleaner code
  • 13
    Great UI
  • 11
    Makes you a better coder
  • 10
    Duplication Detection
  • 5
    Safe and Secure
  • 2
    Private
  • 2
    Extremely accurate in telling you the errors
  • 2
    GitHub only
  • 2
    Python inspection
  • 2
    Great open community
  • 2
    GitHub integration, status inline in PRs
  • 2
    Uses rubocop
  • 1
    Locally Installable API
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 1
    Difficult to deploy

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Code Climate
Cons of ESLint
Cons of SonarQube
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 7
      Sales process is long and unfriendly
    • 7
      Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
    • 1
      Does not integrate with Snyk

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Code Climate?

    After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

    What is ESLint?

    A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

    What is SonarQube?

    SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Code Climate?
    What companies use ESLint?
    What companies use SonarQube?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Code Climate?
    What tools integrate with ESLint?
    What tools integrate with SonarQube?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+26
    29
    15934
    GitHubMySQLSlack+44
    109
    50653
    What are some alternatives to Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube?
    Codacy
    Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.
    Codecov
    Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
    Coveralls
    Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
    GitPrime
    GitPrime uses data from GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket—or any Git based code repository—to help engineering leaders move faster, optimize work patterns, and advocate for engineering with concrete data.
    RuboCop
    RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
    See all alternatives