StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Code Climate vs ESLint vs SonarQube

Code Climate vs ESLint vs SonarQube

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Climate
Code Climate
Stacks740
Followers497
Votes285
SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

Code Climate vs ESLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown document will compare the key differences between Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube.

  1. Integration with IDEs: Code Climate offers seamless integration with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ IDEA, providing real-time feedback to developers within their coding environment. On the other hand, ESLint and SonarQube typically require setting up separate configurations or plugins within the IDEs for code analysis.

  2. Focus on Language Support: ESLint is a JavaScript-specific linter, focusing solely on analyzing and identifying issues in JavaScript code. In contrast, Code Climate and SonarQube support a broader range of programming languages, making them suitable for multi-language projects where consistent code quality checks are needed across different languages.

  3. Pricing Model: Code Climate follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering different tiered plans based on the size and needs of the organization. ESLint, on the other hand, is an open-source tool available for free with community support. SonarQube also offers a free Community Edition but requires a license for additional features and support in the Enterprise Edition.

  4. Rule Customization: ESLint allows developers to customize rules or create their own rules using JavaScript, providing flexibility in defining code quality standards based on specific project requirements. Code Climate and SonarQube have predefined rule sets that may be customizable to some extent but may not offer the same level of fine-grained rule customization as ESLint.

  5. Parallel Analysis: Code Climate is known for its parallel analysis capabilities, allowing for faster code reviews and analysis of large codebases by distributing the workload across multiple processors or machines. While SonarQube also supports parallel analysis for certain languages, ESLint does not have native support for parallel analysis, potentially leading to slower analysis times for extensive codebases.

  6. Community Support: ESLint benefits from a vast and active community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, ensuring continuous improvements, updates, and support. Code Climate and SonarQube also have active user communities, but ESLint's community-driven development model may provide more immediate access to new features and enhancements through community plugins and extensions.

In Summary, Code Climate, ESLint, and SonarQube differ in terms of integration with IDEs, language support, pricing models, rule customization, parallel analysis capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Code Climate, SonarQube, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate
Code Climate
SonarQube
SonarQube
ESLint
ESLint

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
740
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
497
Followers
2.0K
Followers
14.0K
Votes
285
Votes
53
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
Cons
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Semaphore
Semaphore
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, SonarQube, ESLint?

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Snyk

Snyk

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana