Codacy vs Code Climate vs PullReview

Codacy
Codacy

172
129
193
Code Climate
Code Climate

407
240
274
PullReview
PullReview

7
13
70
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Codacy?

Codacy is an automated code review tool for Scala, Java, Ruby, JavaScript, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS. It's continuous static analysis without the hassle. Save time in Code Reviews. Tackle your technical debt

What is Code Climate?

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

What is PullReview?

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Codacy?
Why do developers choose Code Climate?
Why do developers choose PullReview?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Codacy?
What are the cons of using Code Climate?
What are the cons of using PullReview?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Codacy?
    What companies use Code Climate?
    What companies use PullReview?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Codacy?
    What tools integrate with Code Climate?
    What tools integrate with PullReview?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Codacy, Code Climate, and PullReview?
    SonarQube
    SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
    Better Code Hub
    Better Code Hub runs the first analysis of any GitHub repository with the default configuration. This default configuration is based on the programming languages reported by GitHub and supported by Better Code Hub. Better Code Hub further uses heuristics and commonly used conventions.
    Codecov
    Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
    codebeat
    codebeat helps you prioritize issues and identify quick wins. It provides immediate and continuous feedback on complexity and duplication
    ESLint
    A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Codacy, Code Climate, and PullReview
    Jerome Dalbert
    Jerome Dalbert
    Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare · | 5 upvotes · 12.4K views
    atStackShareStackShare
    Git
    Rails
    RSpec
    RuboCop
    Brakeman
    Code Climate
    CircleCI
    GitHub
    #ContinuousIntegration

    The continuous integration process for our Rails backend app starts by opening a GitHub pull request. This triggers a CircleCI build and some Code Climate checks.

    The CircleCI build is a workflow that runs the following jobs:

    • check for security vulnerabilities with Brakeman
    • check code quality with RuboCop
    • run RSpec tests in parallel with the knapsack gem, and output test coverage reports with the simplecov gem
    • upload test coverage to Code Climate

    Code Climate checks the following:

    • code quality metrics like code complexity
    • test coverage minimum thresholds

    The CircleCI jobs and Code Climate checks above have corresponding GitHub status checks.

    Once all the mandatory GitHub checks pass and the code+functionality have been reviewed, developers can merge their pull request into our Git master branch. Code is then ready to deploy!

    #ContinuousIntegration

    See more
    Codacy
    codebeat
    SonarQube

    It is very important to have clean code. To be sure that the code quality is not really bad I use a few tools. I love SonarQube with many relevant hints and deep analysis of code. codebeat isn't so detailed, but it can find complexity issues and duplications. Codacy cannot find more bugs then your IDE. The winner for me is SonarQube that shows me really relevant bugs in my code.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Codacy, Code Climate, and PullReview
    Review ofPullReviewPullReview

    PullReview is an amazing tool to improve your workflow by doing code review without having to intervene. Just push your feature branches and wait for the review to finish. This ensures you don't have to stop coding while you reap the benefits of spotting mistakes or code that needs a refactor before it is merged.

    The team is helpful, responds quickly and knows their stuff. Give it a go!

    Review ofCode ClimateCode Climate

    This is one of the key tools I can't leave out when I'm working on a project, basically it is mandatory for me to use it on my Ruby on Rails projects. I think the price is a little expensive for a "Solo plan" but if you can get your client to pay, it's definitely worth it. You or the future developers that will continue with the project will thank you!

    Review ofPullReviewPullReview

    I liked how fast it all went with installing Pull Review and also that in a glance I know on which part I still have to work to become better. Last but not least, responsiveness is one of the team's strength: whenever you'd need help or have a question, they'll reply in no time. Totally recommended!

    Review ofPullReviewPullReview

    Very helpful code review. Team very quick to respond to issues problems.

    How developers use Codacy, Code Climate, and PullReview
    Avatar of Andrew Gatenby
    Andrew Gatenby uses Code ClimateCode Climate

    We use it as part of CI process to check code quality, to ensure that we're not inadvertently making common mistakes and can keep the smells and scope of code changes in line and clean. Having this step here should make future support and additions much more efficient and easy to understand.

    Avatar of Stefan Gojan
    Stefan Gojan uses Code ClimateCode Climate

    Check duplicate code, complexity and common pitfalls. Code coverage indicator for Github README file.

    Avatar of Romans Malinovskis
    Romans Malinovskis uses Code ClimateCode Climate

    checking our repo code quality.

    Avatar of Sascha Manns
    Sascha Manns uses Code ClimateCode Climate

    Codeclimate checks my code and helps me to write better code.

    Avatar of GREGORY NICHOLAS
    GREGORY NICHOLAS uses CodacyCodacy

    for automated code review, static analysis.

    Avatar of Publitory
    Publitory uses Code ClimateCode Climate

    We check our deployments with CodeClimate

    Avatar of scott hutchinson
    scott hutchinson uses CodacyCodacy

    Real time AI for code reviews

    Avatar of InstaGIS
    InstaGIS uses CodacyCodacy

    Review our code quality

    How much does Codacy cost?
    How much does Code Climate cost?
    How much does PullReview cost?
    News about Codacy
    More news
    News about PullReview
    More news