Codecov vs Concourse

Overview

Codecov

Stacks2.8K

Followers325

Votes102

Concourse

Stacks254

Followers393

Votes54

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks870

Codecov vs Concourse: What are the differences?

1. **Integration with CI/CD tools**: Codecov integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Travis CI, allowing for easy automation of code coverage reporting. Concourse, on the other hand, is a continuous integration tool that focuses on pipeline automation for complex workflows. 2. **Focus on code coverage metrics**: Codecov specifically specializes in providing detailed code coverage metrics, including branch coverage and line coverage reports, to help developers understand the quality of their tests. Concourse, while it can be configured to run tests and report coverage, does not have the same level of granularity in its reporting as Codecov. 3. **User interface**: Codecov offers a user-friendly web interface that visually presents code coverage data, making it easy for developers to analyze and interpret the metrics. Concourse, being a pipeline automation tool, prioritizes providing a clear view of the pipeline stages and status rather than detailed code coverage data. 4. **Community and support**: Codecov has a strong community presence and offers comprehensive support resources, including documentation, tutorials, and forums, to assist users in troubleshooting and optimizing code coverage analysis. Concourse also has an active community, but its focus is more on sharing pipeline templates and best practices rather than code coverage support. 5. **Real-time feedback**: Codecov provides real-time feedback on code coverage results, allowing developers to quickly identify areas that need improvement and make adjustments to their testing strategies. Concourse, while it can provide feedback on test results, does not offer the same level of real-time analysis and insight into code coverage. 6. **Cost and pricing**: Codecov offers various pricing plans, including a free tier for open-source projects, as well as premium plans for larger organizations with advanced features. Concourse, as an open-source tool, is free to use but may require additional resources for setting up and maintaining complex pipelines.

In Summary, Codecov specializes in code coverage metrics with deep integration with CI/CD tools, while Concourse focuses on pipeline automation for complex workflows with a strong community presence but limited code coverage reporting capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codecov, Concourse

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codecov	Concourse
Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.	Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 870
Stacks 2.8K	Stacks 254
Followers 325	Followers 393
Votes 102	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Easy setup 17 More stable than coveralls 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage 0 Support does not respond to email	Pros 16 Real pipelines 10 Containerised builds 9 Flexible engine 6 Fast 4 Open source Cons 2 Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Integrations
HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitLab GitHub CircleCI Heroku	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Codecov, Concourse?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Codecov vs Concourse: What are the differences?

Codecov vs Concourse

Overview