CoffeeScript vs HAML: What are the differences?
CoffeeScript and HAML belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.
"Easy to read" is the primary reason why developers consider CoffeeScript over the competitors, whereas "Clean and simple" was stated as the key factor in picking HAML.
CoffeeScript and HAML are both open source tools. It seems that CoffeeScript with 15.2K GitHub stars and 1.99K forks on GitHub has more adoption than HAML with 3.44K GitHub stars and 544 GitHub forks.
Code School, Zaarly, and thoughtbot are some of the popular companies that use CoffeeScript, whereas HAML is used by Kickstarter, Code School, and StackShare. CoffeeScript has a broader approval, being mentioned in 364 company stacks & 170 developers stacks; compared to HAML, which is listed in 113 company stacks and 40 developer stacks.
What is CoffeeScript?
What is HAML?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Personally, I really like HAML. Not having to use open and close tags is a huge time saver. As a result, writing markup with HAML is much more pleasant. HAML essentially forces you to be very strict about spacing, organization, and structure. It also makes the markup easier to read. Protip: I use this pretty frequently: htmltohaml.com
All front-end / back-end is driven by Coffeescript. For the main ReactJS functionality JSX is embedded with coffee in .cjsx files / handled by Browserify.
We like CoffeeScript because it's more readable, we use it because we have a lot of libraries and functions already (plays nicely with Rails, too)