StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Concourse vs Github Actions

Concourse vs Github Actions

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Concourse vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction

Concourse and Github Actions are two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms used for automating software workflows. While both platforms serve similar purposes, there are key differences that make them unique and cater to different needs.

  1. Architecture: One major difference between Concourse and Github Actions lies in their underlying architecture. Concourse follows a distributed and pipeline-based architecture, where each step of the workflow is executed in isolation. On the other hand, Github Actions follow a serverless architecture, where workflows are executed on virtual machines with pre-installed software.

  2. Flexibility: Concourse provides a higher level of flexibility compared to Github Actions. With Concourse, users have complete control over their infrastructure and can define custom resources and tasks. In contrast, Github Actions offers a more streamlined and standardized approach, limiting the flexibility to customize the execution environment.

  3. Integration: Github Actions offers seamless integration with the Github ecosystem. Users can trigger workflows based on events such as pull requests, issue updates, or code pushes. Concourse, on the other hand, can integrate with various systems using external triggers or custom resources, making it suitable for complex multi-step workflows.

  4. Language Support: Github Actions supports a diverse range of programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and more. Concourse, on the other hand, relies on Docker containers, enabling users to run tasks or build pipelines using any programming language or framework supported by Docker.

  5. Visibility and Debugging: Concourse provides better visibility and debugging capabilities compared to Github Actions. Concourse includes a web-based user interface that allows users to view the status of each step, visualize the pipeline, and troubleshoot issues. Github Actions also provides a web-based interface, but it may not offer the same level of detail and granularity for troubleshooting.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Github Actions benefits from the large and vibrant Github community, with a wide range of pre-built actions and integrations available for use. Concourse, although it has a smaller community, offers a rich ecosystem of resources, including pipelines shared by other users, reusable tasks, and plugins.

In summary, Concourse and Github Actions differ in their underlying architecture, flexibility, integration capabilities, language support, visibility/debugging features, and community/ecosystem. Choosing between the two depends on specific workflow requirements and preferences for customization and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Concourse, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Concourse
Concourse
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

-
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
870
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
254
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
393
Followers
3.1K
Votes
54
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Concourse, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana