Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Concourse vs Github Actions: What are the differences?
Introduction
Concourse and Github Actions are two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms used for automating software workflows. While both platforms serve similar purposes, there are key differences that make them unique and cater to different needs.
Architecture: One major difference between Concourse and Github Actions lies in their underlying architecture. Concourse follows a distributed and pipeline-based architecture, where each step of the workflow is executed in isolation. On the other hand, Github Actions follow a serverless architecture, where workflows are executed on virtual machines with pre-installed software.
Flexibility: Concourse provides a higher level of flexibility compared to Github Actions. With Concourse, users have complete control over their infrastructure and can define custom resources and tasks. In contrast, Github Actions offers a more streamlined and standardized approach, limiting the flexibility to customize the execution environment.
Integration: Github Actions offers seamless integration with the Github ecosystem. Users can trigger workflows based on events such as pull requests, issue updates, or code pushes. Concourse, on the other hand, can integrate with various systems using external triggers or custom resources, making it suitable for complex multi-step workflows.
Language Support: Github Actions supports a diverse range of programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and more. Concourse, on the other hand, relies on Docker containers, enabling users to run tasks or build pipelines using any programming language or framework supported by Docker.
Visibility and Debugging: Concourse provides better visibility and debugging capabilities compared to Github Actions. Concourse includes a web-based user interface that allows users to view the status of each step, visualize the pipeline, and troubleshoot issues. Github Actions also provides a web-based interface, but it may not offer the same level of detail and granularity for troubleshooting.
Community and Ecosystem: Github Actions benefits from the large and vibrant Github community, with a wide range of pre-built actions and integrations available for use. Concourse, although it has a smaller community, offers a rich ecosystem of resources, including pipelines shared by other users, reusable tasks, and plugins.
In summary, Concourse and Github Actions differ in their underlying architecture, flexibility, integration capabilities, language support, visibility/debugging features, and community/ecosystem. Choosing between the two depends on specific workflow requirements and preferences for customization and ease of use.
I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !
I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.
Pros of Concourse
- Real pipelines16
- Containerised builds10
- Flexible engine9
- Fast6
- Open source4
- No Snowflakes3
- Simple configuration management3
- You have to do everything2
- Fancy Visualization1
Pros of GitHub Actions
- Integration with GitHub8
- Free5
- Easy to duplicate a workflow3
- Ready actions in Marketplace3
- Configs stored in .github2
- Docker Support2
- Read actions in Marketplace2
- Active Development Roadmap1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Concourse
- Fail forward instead of rollback pattern2
Cons of GitHub Actions
- Lacking [skip ci]5
- Lacking allow failure4
- Lacking job specific badges3
- No ssh login to servers2
- No Deployment Projects1
- No manual launch1