Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Concourse

259
389
+ 1
54
GitHub Actions

22.1K
2.4K
+ 1
27
Add tool

Concourse vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction

Concourse and Github Actions are two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms used for automating software workflows. While both platforms serve similar purposes, there are key differences that make them unique and cater to different needs.

  1. Architecture: One major difference between Concourse and Github Actions lies in their underlying architecture. Concourse follows a distributed and pipeline-based architecture, where each step of the workflow is executed in isolation. On the other hand, Github Actions follow a serverless architecture, where workflows are executed on virtual machines with pre-installed software.

  2. Flexibility: Concourse provides a higher level of flexibility compared to Github Actions. With Concourse, users have complete control over their infrastructure and can define custom resources and tasks. In contrast, Github Actions offers a more streamlined and standardized approach, limiting the flexibility to customize the execution environment.

  3. Integration: Github Actions offers seamless integration with the Github ecosystem. Users can trigger workflows based on events such as pull requests, issue updates, or code pushes. Concourse, on the other hand, can integrate with various systems using external triggers or custom resources, making it suitable for complex multi-step workflows.

  4. Language Support: Github Actions supports a diverse range of programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and more. Concourse, on the other hand, relies on Docker containers, enabling users to run tasks or build pipelines using any programming language or framework supported by Docker.

  5. Visibility and Debugging: Concourse provides better visibility and debugging capabilities compared to Github Actions. Concourse includes a web-based user interface that allows users to view the status of each step, visualize the pipeline, and troubleshoot issues. Github Actions also provides a web-based interface, but it may not offer the same level of detail and granularity for troubleshooting.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Github Actions benefits from the large and vibrant Github community, with a wide range of pre-built actions and integrations available for use. Concourse, although it has a smaller community, offers a rich ecosystem of resources, including pipelines shared by other users, reusable tasks, and plugins.

In summary, Concourse and Github Actions differ in their underlying architecture, flexibility, integration capabilities, language support, visibility/debugging features, and community/ecosystem. Choosing between the two depends on specific workflow requirements and preferences for customization and ease of use.

Advice on Concourse and GitHub Actions
Needs advice
on
ConcourseConcourse
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

See more
Replies (1)
Maxi Krone
Cloud Engineer at fme AG · | 2 upvotes · 399.1K views
Recommends
on
ConcourseConcourse

I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Concourse
Pros of GitHub Actions
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    No Snowflakes
  • 3
    Simple configuration management
  • 2
    You have to do everything
  • 1
    Fancy Visualization
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
  • 2
    Docker Support
  • 2
    Read actions in Marketplace
  • 1
    Active Development Roadmap
  • 1
    Fast

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Concourse
Cons of GitHub Actions
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No Deployment Projects
  • 1
    No manual launch

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Concourse?

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

What is GitHub Actions?

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Concourse and GitHub Actions as a desired skillset
What companies use Concourse?
What companies use GitHub Actions?
See which teams inside your own company are using Concourse or GitHub Actions.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Concourse?
What tools integrate with GitHub Actions?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Concourse and GitHub Actions?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
CircleCI
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
Spinnaker
Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
GitLab CI
GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
See all alternatives