Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Confluent

245
236
+ 1
14
Hutch

3
9
+ 1
0
Add tool

Hutch vs Confluent: What are the differences?

Hutch: Inter-Service Communication with RabbitMQ. Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ; Confluent: We make a stream data platform to help companies harness their high volume real-time data streams. It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream.

Hutch belongs to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack, while Confluent can be primarily classified under "Stream Processing".

Some of the features offered by Hutch are:

  • A simple way to define consumers (queues are automatically created and bound to the exchange with the appropriate binding keys)
  • An executable and CLI for running consumers (akin to rake resque:work)
  • Automatic setup of the central exchange

On the other hand, Confluent provides the following key features:

  • Reliable
  • High-performance stream data platform
  • Manage and organize data from different sources.

Hutch is an open source tool with 713 GitHub stars and 104 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hutch's open source repository on GitHub.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Confluent
Pros of Hutch
  • 4
    Free for casual use
  • 3
    No hypercloud lock-in
  • 3
    Dashboard for kafka insight
  • 2
    Easily scalable
  • 2
    Zero devops
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Confluent
    Cons of Hutch
    • 1
      Proprietary
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      1.9K
      2
      299

      What is Confluent?

      It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

      What is Hutch?

      Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Confluent?
      What companies use Hutch?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Confluent?
      What tools integrate with Hutch?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Confluent and Hutch?
      Databricks
      Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, from the original creators of Apache Spark™, unifies data science and engineering across the Machine Learning lifecycle from data preparation to experimentation and deployment of ML applications.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      See all alternatives