Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Consul

1.2K
1.5K
+ 1
213
LXD

104
194
+ 1
68
Add tool

Consul vs LXD: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment: Consul is typically deployed as a set of independent servers while LXD is designed to be deployed on a single machine running the Linux operating system. Consul's distributed setup allows for high availability and fault tolerance in service discovery and orchestration processes.

  2. Functionality: Consul primarily focuses on service discovery, configuration, and health checking for distributed systems, whereas LXD is more focused on lightweight virtualization through Linux containers, providing a system-level virtualization solution for applications.

  3. Scaling: Consul is designed to scale horizontally by adding more server instances to handle increased workloads and manage larger sets of services, while LXD is limited to scaling vertically on a single machine by utilizing its host resources efficiently for running multiple containers.

  4. Networking: Consul focuses on service networking and connecting various services within a distributed system effectively, ensuring reliable communication and coordination, while LXD focuses on providing network isolation and container networking within a single host machine without the complexity of distributed networking.

  5. Management: Consul offers advanced features for service monitoring, discovery, and configuration management in dynamic environments, providing a robust solution for maintaining service integrity and reliability, whereas LXD offers simplified container management and deployment capabilities with a focus on resource efficiency on a single host.

  6. Use Cases: Consul is commonly used in microservices architectures and cloud-native applications for managing service discovery and orchestration, while LXD is preferred for lightweight, portable, and isolated container deployments, suitable for development environments or server consolidation scenarios.

In Summary, Consul and LXD differ in deployment architecture, functionality focus, scaling capabilities, networking approach, management features, and preferred use cases in networking and cloud computing environments.

Decisions about Consul and LXD
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 464.5K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Consul
Pros of LXD
  • 61
    Great service discovery infrastructure
  • 35
    Health checking
  • 29
    Distributed key-value store
  • 26
    Monitoring
  • 23
    High-availability
  • 12
    Web-UI
  • 10
    Token-based acls
  • 6
    Gossip clustering
  • 5
    Dns server
  • 4
    Not Java
  • 1
    Docker integration
  • 1
    Javascript
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Best
  • 7
    Cluster
  • 5
    Multiprocess isolation (not single)
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    I like the goal of the LXD and found it to work great
  • 4
    Full OS isolation
  • 3
    Container
  • 3
    More stateful than docker
  • 2
    Systemctl compatibility

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

261
24
1.2K
799
153
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Consul?

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

What is LXD?

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Consul?
What companies use LXD?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Consul?
What tools integrate with LXD?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Consul and LXD?
etcd
etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.
Zookeeper
A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.
SkyDNS
SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).
Ambassador
Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
See all alternatives