Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Continua CI vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?
Developers describe Continua CI as "Easy to use Continuous Integration for everyone". It is an Easy to use, Scalable and Affordable Continuous Integration Server. With an intuitive user interface, it takes just minutes to get up and running With support for Visual Studio, MSBuild, Ant, Nant, Rake, FinalBuilder, Git, Hg, Svn, Perforce and many other tools, Continua CI has something for everyone. . On the other hand, Zuul CI is detailed as "A program that drives continuous integration, delivery, and deployment systems with a focus on project gating and interrelated projects". It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.
Continua CI and Zuul CI belong to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Continua CI are:
- Easy installation, can be up and running in minutes
- Run multiple build for the same or different projects and configurations concurrently
- Automate builds using MSBuild, FinalBuilder, Ant, Nant, Rake, Fake, Visual Studio and other build runners
On the other hand, Zuul CI provides the following key features:
- Project Gating
- CI/CD with Ansible
- Cross-Project Dependencies
Pros of Continua CI
Pros of Zuul CI
- No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost1
- Open-source Mostly used with Openstack1
- Hard to configure1