1. Deployment Models: Convox primarily focuses on providing a platform for deploying and managing containerized applications using Docker and Kubernetes. On the other hand, Google Anthos offers a broader set of services for managing hybrid and multi-cloud environments, allowing users to deploy and manage applications across different cloud providers. Anthos also provides support for virtual machines, making it suitable for organizations with a diverse infrastructure setup.

2. Scalability and Flexibility: Convox is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses looking to rapidly deploy applications in a cloud-native environment. Google Anthos, on the other hand, offers advanced scalability features, such as auto-scaling and load balancing, making it more suitable for large enterprises with complex infrastructure needs. Anthos also provides advanced networking capabilities, allowing users to build robust and secure networks across different cloud environments.

3. Vendor Lock-in: With Convox, users have the freedom to deploy their applications on any cloud provider that supports Kubernetes, reducing the risk of vendor lock-in. Google Anthos, while offering multi-cloud support, is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform (GCP), potentially leading to vendor lock-in for organizations heavily invested in Google's ecosystem. This difference in vendor lock-in can influence the long-term strategy and cost considerations for businesses.

4. Monitoring and Logging: Convox provides basic monitoring and logging capabilities for applications deployed on its platform, allowing users to track performance metrics and debug issues. Google Anthos, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive monitoring and logging solution through integration with Google Cloud's Monitoring and Logging services. This enhanced visibility and control over applications can be beneficial for organizations prioritizing operational efficiency and troubleshooting.

5. Cost Management: Convox follows a straightforward pricing model based on resource consumption and usage of additional services, making it easy for users to estimate and manage costs. Google Anthos, on the other hand, offers a more complex pricing structure that includes factors like storage, networking, and support, which can make cost management challenging for organizations with dynamic workloads and diverse infrastructure requirements. Understanding the cost implications of using Anthos is essential for optimizing resource utilization and budget allocation.

6. Security Features: Both Convox and Google Anthos prioritize security in their platforms, offering features like role-based access control (RBAC), encryption, and compliance certifications to ensure data protection and regulatory compliance. However, Google Anthos provides additional security capabilities, such as vulnerability scanning, policy enforcement, and identity management, leveraging Google Cloud's advanced security tools and protocols. Organizations with stringent security requirements may benefit from Anthos' robust security posture and integrated threat detection capabilities.

In Summary, Convox and Google Anthos differ in deployment models, scalability, vendor lock-in, monitoring, logging, cost management, and security features, catering to diverse needs in cloud-native application development and management.