Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CrossBrowserTesting

Stacks37

Followers41

+ 1

Votes0

Karma

Stacks2.5K

Followers602

+ 1

Votes181

Add tool

Karma vs CrossBrowserTesting : What are the differences?

Karma: Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript. Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like; CrossBrowserTesting : A cross browser testing tools for devices and real browsers. Browser testing is a method of quality assurance for web applications across multiple browsers. It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.

Karma and CrossBrowserTesting can be primarily classified as "Browser Testing" tools.

Some of the features offered by Karma are:

Test on Real Devices
Remote Control
Testing Framework Agnostic

On the other hand, CrossBrowserTesting provides the following key features:

Live Testing
Automated Screenshots
Visual Comparisons

Karma is an open source tool with 10.8K GitHub stars and 1.62K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Karma's open source repository on GitHub.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.

Learn More

Pros of CrossBrowserTesting

Pros of Karma

Be the first to leave a pro

61
Test Runner
35
Open source
27
Continuous Integration
22
Great for running tests
18
Test on Real Devices
11
Backed by google
5
Easy Debugging
2
Remote Control

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of CrossBrowserTesting

Cons of Karma

Be the first to leave a con

1
Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
1
Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is CrossBrowserTesting ?

It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.

What is Karma?

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention CrossBrowserTesting and Karma as a desired skillset

Strategic Solution Engineer

Postman

Toronto, Canada

View Job Details

Strategic Solution Engineer

Postman

Boston/ NYC, United States

View Job Details

Senior Engineer (Frontend), IDE Platform

Postman

Bangalore, India

View Job Details

Scale Solutions Architect

Postman

, USA

View Job Details

Strategic Solution Engineer (West)

Postman

, United States

View Job Details

Executive Assistant to Head of Product and Head of Engineering

Postman

Berkeley, United States OR San Francisco, United States

View Job Details

Engineering Manager, Test Infrastructure

Postman

Bangalore, India

View Job Details

Technical Support Engineer

Postman

Boston/ NYC, United States

View Job Details

+11

See jobs for CrossBrowserTesting

See jobs for Karma

What companies use CrossBrowserTesting ?

What companies use Karma?

See which teams inside your own company are using CrossBrowserTesting or Karma.

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with CrossBrowserTesting ?

What tools integrate with Karma?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and Karma?

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

TestComplete

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

See all alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting vs Karma

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Pros of CrossBrowserTesting

Pros of Karma

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of CrossBrowserTesting

Cons of Karma

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is CrossBrowserTesting ?

What is Karma?

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use CrossBrowserTesting ?

What companies use Karma?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with CrossBrowserTesting ?

What tools integrate with Karma?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Related Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

Top Comparisons