StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Crucible vs Fisheye

Crucible vs Fisheye

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Crucible
Crucible
Stacks55
Followers118
Votes12
Fisheye
Fisheye
Stacks40
Followers41
Votes0

Crucible vs Fisheye: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Crucible and Fisheye, two popular code review tools. Crucible and Fisheye are both developed by Atlassian, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: One of the major differences between Crucible and Fisheye is their integration with version control systems. While Fisheye is primarily a repository browser that provides a unified view of multiple repositories, Crucible is a code review tool that integrates with version control systems to facilitate collaborative code reviews. This means that Crucible not only allows users to browse code but also provides a structured workflow for code reviews.

  2. Code Review Workflow: Crucible offers a rich and customizable code review workflow that allows users to define their own review process. It supports pre-commit and post-commit reviews, making it flexible for different development workflows. On the other hand, Fisheye does not have a built-in code review workflow and mainly focuses on providing code browsing and search capabilities.

  3. Commenting and Collaboration: Crucible provides advanced commenting and collaboration features to streamline the code review process. It allows reviewers to leave comments directly on code lines, which ensures that discussions are tied to the relevant code portions. In contrast, Fisheye does not have these built-in commenting and collaboration features, as it primarily focuses on providing an overview of code repositories.

  4. Metrics and Reporting: While Crucible offers detailed metrics and reporting capabilities to track code review progress and identify bottlenecks, Fisheye does not have these features. Crucible provides statistics such as lines of code reviewed, review completion time, and review participant statistics. This helps teams analyze their code review process and make data-driven improvements.

  5. Integration with Other Atlassian Products: Crucible seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products, such as JIRA and Bitbucket. This allows for a smooth workflow from issue tracking to code review and merge. Fisheye, on the other hand, is not integrated with these products and mainly serves as a standalone repository browser.

  6. Search and Filtering Capabilities: Fisheye provides powerful search and filtering capabilities that allow users to quickly find and navigate through code repositories. It supports searching code, commits, authors, and more. Crucible, on the other hand, does not have these extensive search and filtering capabilities as its primary focus is on code review rather than code exploration.

In summary, Crucible is a dedicated code review tool with advanced commenting, collaboration, and reporting features, while Fisheye is primarily a repository browser with powerful search and filtering capabilities. Crucible's integration with version control systems and other Atlassian products makes it a comprehensive solution for streamlined code reviews within the development workflow. Fisheye, on the other hand, provides a centralized view of code repositories, making it useful for code exploration and search.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Crucible
Crucible
Fisheye
Fisheye

It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.

FishEye provides a read-only window into your Subversion, Perforce, CVS, Git, and Mercurial repositories, all in one place. Keep a pulse on everything about your code: Visualize and report on activity, integrate source with JIRA issues, and search for commits, files, revisions, or people.

Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Track code activity in one place;Cross-version control support;Code search;Commit graph
Statistics
Stacks
55
Stacks
40
Followers
118
Followers
41
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    JIRA Integration
  • 4
    Post-commit preview
  • 2
    Has a linux version
  • 1
    Pre-commit preview
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Confluence
Confluence
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to Crucible, Fisheye?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana