StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Crucible vs Gerrit Code Review

Crucible vs Gerrit Code Review

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Crucible
Crucible
Stacks55
Followers118
Votes12
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Crucible vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software development, code review tools play a crucial role in maintaining code quality and ensuring team collaboration. Two popular tools used for code reviews are Crucible and Gerrit Code Review. Below are the key differences between these two tools.

  1. Integration with Version Control System: Crucible is tightly integrated with Atlassian's version control systems like Bitbucket and Git, providing seamless code review within the development workflow. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review is built specifically for use with Git repositories, offering deep integration with Git functionalities for efficient code review processes.

  2. User Interface and User Experience: Crucible offers a user-friendly web-based interface with intuitive features and easy navigation, allowing users to easily collaborate and review code. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review provides a more minimalistic and command-line interface, which can be less beginner-friendly but preferred by users who prefer a more focused and streamlined environment.

  3. Permission Management: Crucible allows for flexible permission management with granular control over user access rights and permissions to specific repositories or projects, enabling administrators to tailor access levels according to the team's needs. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review offers a more strict and fixed permission model, which may not provide as much customization compared to Crucible.

  4. Workflow and Process Customization: Crucible provides customizable workflows and process automation features, allowing teams to define their code review process based on their specific requirements and project workflows. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review has a more rigid workflow structure, making it less flexible for teams that require extensive customization options.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Crucible has an extensive plugin ecosystem that allows for integration with various third-party tools and services, enhancing its functionality and extending its capabilities. Meanwhile, Gerrit Code Review has a smaller plugin ecosystem, which may limit the options for integrating with other tools and services, making it less versatile in terms of extensibility.

  6. Community Support and Maintenance: Crucible is supported by Atlassian, a well-established software company with regular updates, maintenance, and strong community support, ensuring the tool's longevity and reliability. Gerrit Code Review, while actively maintained by the open-source community, may have a slightly less robust support system compared to Crucible's official support channels.

In Summary, Crucible and Gerrit Code Review differ in integration with Version Control Systems, User Interface, Permission Management, Workflow Customization, Plugin Ecosystem, and Community Support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Crucible
Crucible
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
55
Stacks
116
Followers
118
Followers
223
Votes
12
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    JIRA Integration
  • 4
    Post-commit preview
  • 2
    Has a linux version
  • 1
    Pre-commit preview
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Confluence
Confluence
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Crucible, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana