Cucumber vs QMetry

Overview

Cucumber

Stacks1.4K

Followers927

Votes36

QMetry

Stacks15

Followers34

Votes0

Cucumber vs QMetry: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here>

Programming Language: Cucumber mainly uses Gherkin, a business-readable, domain-specific language, while QMetry uses Test Authoring in Java, allowing users to write test cases in Java language. This difference affects how tests are written and executed in each tool.
Integration: Cucumber offers integration with various languages and frameworks such as Ruby, Java, and JavaScript, making it versatile. On the other hand, QMetry integrates seamlessly with Jira, Agile Methodologies, and Continuous Integration tools, providing a different set of features to users.
Reporting: Cucumber provides detailed and well-organized HTML reports with features like tagging, hooks, and plugins for customized reporting. QMetry, in contrast, offers advanced reporting capabilities with dashboards, analytics, and real-time insights, enhancing the visibility and decision-making process for stakeholders.
Test Management Features: While Cucumber primarily focuses on behavior-driven development and automation testing, QMetry offers a comprehensive test management platform with features like test planning, execution, and tracking, catering to diverse testing needs of organizations.
Community Support: Cucumber boasts a large and active community of developers, testers, and contributors who provide extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. QMetry, although not as widely known, offers dedicated customer support, training, and consultancy services to its users, ensuring personalized assistance and guidance.
Ecosystem Compatibility: Cucumber is widely used in Agile development environments, continuous integration, and DevOps practices due to its compatibility and ease of integration with popular tools and frameworks. QMetry, on the other hand, is preferred in enterprise testing scenarios, compliance-driven industries, and regulated environments where robust test management capabilities are crucial.

In Summary, Cucumber and QMetry differ in programming language, integration options, reporting capabilities, test management features, community support, and ecosystem compatibility, catering to distinct user requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber	QMetry
Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.	It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles
-	TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.
Statistics
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 15
Followers 927	Followers 34
Votes 36	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 20 Simple Syntax 8 Simple usage 5 Huge community 3 Nice report	Cons 1 Some terms and processes are confusing 1 Slow and clunky
Integrations
No integrations available	TestFlight UserTesting Jira TestNG

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, QMetry?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

Cucumber vs QMetry: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here>

Programming Language: Cucumber mainly uses Gherkin, a business-readable, domain-specific language, while QMetry uses Test Authoring in Java, allowing users to write test cases in Java language. This difference affects how tests are written and executed in each tool.
Integration: Cucumber offers integration with various languages and frameworks such as Ruby, Java, and JavaScript, making it versatile. On the other hand, QMetry integrates seamlessly with Jira, Agile Methodologies, and Continuous Integration tools, providing a different set of features to users.
Reporting: Cucumber provides detailed and well-organized HTML reports with features like tagging, hooks, and plugins for customized reporting. QMetry, in contrast, offers advanced reporting capabilities with dashboards, analytics, and real-time insights, enhancing the visibility and decision-making process for stakeholders.
Test Management Features: While Cucumber primarily focuses on behavior-driven development and automation testing, QMetry offers a comprehensive test management platform with features like test planning, execution, and tracking, catering to diverse testing needs of organizations.
Community Support: Cucumber boasts a large and active community of developers, testers, and contributors who provide extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. QMetry, although not as widely known, offers dedicated customer support, training, and consultancy services to its users, ensuring personalized assistance and guidance.
Ecosystem Compatibility: Cucumber is widely used in Agile development environments, continuous integration, and DevOps practices due to its compatibility and ease of integration with popular tools and frameworks. QMetry, on the other hand, is preferred in enterprise testing scenarios, compliance-driven industries, and regulated environments where robust test management capabilities are crucial.

Cucumber vs QMetry

Overview