Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Cygwin vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Cygwin and Ubuntu. Both Cygwin and Ubuntu are popular operating systems, but they have various differences that set them apart from each other.
File System: One key difference between Cygwin and Ubuntu is the file system they use. Cygwin uses a Windows-based file system, which means it is compatible with Windows applications and utilities. On the other hand, Ubuntu uses the Linux file system, which is widely used in the Linux world and offers various advantages such as better security, permissions, and support for Linux-based applications.
Package Manager: Another significant difference is the package manager each operating system uses. Cygwin utilizes the "setup-x86.exe" package manager, which allows users to install and update software packages specifically designed for Cygwin. In contrast, Ubuntu employs the "apt-get" or "apt" package manager, which is used to install, update, and manage software packages specifically created for Ubuntu.
User Interface: The user interface is also a notable difference between Cygwin and Ubuntu. Cygwin provides a command-line interface that allows users to interact with the operating system through text-based commands. It is designed to provide a Unix-like environment on Windows. On the other hand, Ubuntu offers a graphical user interface (GUI) known as the Unity desktop environment, making it more user-friendly and visually intuitive for users who prefer a graphical interface.
Hardware Compatibility: Cygwin and Ubuntu differ in terms of hardware compatibility. Cygwin is specifically designed to run on Windows operating systems and therefore, supports a wide range of hardware devices that are compatible with Windows. On the other hand, Ubuntu is compatible with a broader range of hardware devices due to its Linux-based nature, making it more versatile when it comes to hardware compatibility.
Supported Applications: The available applications and software for Cygwin and Ubuntu also differ significantly. Cygwin primarily supports Windows-based applications, providing compatibility for various Windows utilities and software packages. On the other hand, Ubuntu offers a vast repository of Linux-based applications, including software packages specifically developed for Linux systems. This allows Ubuntu users to have access to a wide range of open-source and Linux-compatible applications.
Community and Support: The community and support for Cygwin and Ubuntu are also distinct. Cygwin has a smaller user base and community compared to Ubuntu, which has a large and active user community. This means that Ubuntu users have access to a wealth of online resources, forums, and documentation, making it easier to find solutions to any issues they might encounter. Cygwin, although still having a supportive community, may have limited resources and online forums for troubleshooting specific Cygwin-related problems.
In summary, Cygwin and Ubuntu differ in terms of their file systems, package managers, user interfaces, hardware compatibility, supported applications, and community/support. These differences make each operating system unique and suitable for different use cases and user preferences.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Cygwin
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Cygwin
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1