StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Cypress vs Sorry-cypress

Cypress vs Sorry-cypress

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress
Stacks8
Followers31
Votes5
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks299

Cypress vs Sorry-cypress: What are the differences?

Cypress is a popular end-to-end testing framework that provides an all-in-one solution for writing, running, and debugging tests, while Sorry-cypress is an open-source alternative that adds distributed test execution and dashboard capabilities to Cypress. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Installation: Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that can be easily installed using npm. On the other hand, Sorry-cypress is an open-source tool that runs on Docker and requires a more complex setup process.

  2. Parallelization: Cypress provides built-in parallelization, allowing developers to run multiple tests simultaneously and greatly reducing the overall test execution time. On the other hand, Sorry-cypress does not have built-in parallelization capabilities, requiring users to set up their own parallel test execution environment.

  3. Test Result Reporting: Cypress provides an interactive test runner that displays detailed test results in real-time. It also generates screenshots and videos for each test run. Sorry-cypress, on the other hand, provides a dashboard that allows users to view and analyze test results, but it does not offer the same level of real-time interactivity and visual reporting as Cypress.

  4. Test Retries: Cypress has an automatic retry mechanism that allows failed tests to be automatically retried, helping to increase the stability and reliability of test runs. Sorry-cypress does not have a built-in test retry mechanism, requiring users to implement their own retry logic.

  5. CI/CD Integration: Cypress has seamless integration with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, making it easy to incorporate end-to-end testing into the development workflow. Sorry-cypress also provides CI/CD integration, but it may require additional configuration and setup.

  6. Community and Documentation: Cypress has a vibrant and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources, making it easy for developers to learn and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter. Sorry-cypress, being a relatively new tool, may have a smaller community and less comprehensive documentation compared to Cypress.

In summary, Cypress offers a seamless testing experience with its powerful features and easy-to-use interface, making it ideal for teams looking for a robust testing solution. In contrast, Sorry-cypress extends Cypress by allowing distributed test execution across multiple machines and providing a centralized dashboard for monitoring test results. While Cypress is suitable for smaller projects or teams, Sorry-cypress enhances scalability and collaboration for larger testing environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cypress
Cypress
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Run cypress tests in parallel with no limitations; Upload screenshots and videos to your own storage; Browse test results, screenshots and video recordings; Self-hosted - use your own infrastructure, own your data; Integrate with GitHub or anything else via webhooks; Ready to use Docker images, Kubernetes and AWS Cloud Formation template
Statistics
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
3.5K
Stacks
8
Followers
2.0K
Followers
31
Votes
115
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
  • 9
    No page object support
Pros
  • 3
    Host your own dashboard privately
  • 2
    Free reports
Cons
  • 1
    HTML reports are not as feature rich as Cypress dash
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Cypress, Sorry-cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana