Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
D3.js vs jQuery: What are the differences?
1. Purpose and Focus: D3.js is primarily a data visualization library that focuses on the binding of data to the Document Object Model (DOM). It provides a way to create interactive and dynamic visualizations using web standards like HTML, CSS, and SVG. On the other hand, jQuery is a general-purpose JavaScript library that simplifies the manipulation and traversal of HTML documents, event handling, and AJAX interactions.
2. Learning Curve: D3.js has a steeper learning curve as it requires a good understanding of web technologies and concepts like SVG, HTML, and CSS. It provides a low-level, direct approach to manipulating the DOM and requires more code to achieve specific tasks. In contrast, jQuery has a shallower learning curve as it abstracts away many of the complexities of web development and provides a simpler, more intuitive syntax.
3. Modularity and Extensibility: D3.js is highly modular and allows for fine-grained control over individual elements of a visualization. It provides a wide range of reusable components and plugins that can be customized and extended to meet specific requirements. jQuery, on the other hand, is less modular and more monolithic in nature, offering a set of predefined methods and functions that cover common use cases.
4. Supported Browsers: D3.js is designed to work on modern browsers that support SVG, HTML5, and CSS3. Older browsers may have limited or no support for D3.js features. jQuery, on the other hand, has a broader browser compatibility and can work on older browsers as well.
5. Performance and Efficiency: D3.js is known for its superior performance and efficiency in handling large datasets and complex visualizations. It leverages the power of web standards like SVG and CSS transitions to optimize rendering and provide smooth animations. jQuery, while capable of handling smaller datasets, may struggle with complex visualizations and may not offer the same level of performance as D3.js.
6. Community and Ecosystem: D3.js has a strong and active community with a wide range of resources, documentation, and examples available. It is widely used in the data visualization community and has a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and extensions. jQuery, being a more general-purpose library, has an even larger community and ecosystem with a plethora of plugins and resources covering various aspects of web development.
In Summary, D3.js is a powerful data visualization library with a steeper learning curve, modular and extendable architecture, browser-specific requirements, superior performance, and a vibrant community. jQuery, on the other hand, is a general-purpose library with a shallower learning curve, broader browser compatibility, and a larger ecosystem of plugins and resources covering different aspects of web development.
I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.
I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of D3.js
- Beautiful visualizations195
- Svg103
- Data-driven92
- Large set of examples81
- Data-driven documents61
- Visualization components24
- Transitions20
- Dynamic properties18
- Plugins16
- Transformation11
- Makes data interactive7
- Open Source4
- Enter and Exit4
- Components4
- Exhaustive3
- Backed by the new york times3
- Easy and beautiful2
- Highly customizable1
- Awesome Community Support1
- Simple elegance1
- Templates, force template1
- Angular 41
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of D3.js
- Beginners cant understand at all11
- Complex syntax6
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2