StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Dandelion vs KrakenD

Dandelion vs KrakenD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Dandelion
Dandelion
Stacks5
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars36
Forks15
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

Dandelion vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Dandelion and KrakenD are two popular API gateways that provide different features and functionalities to manage APIs effectively. Below are the key differences between Dandelion and KrakenD.

1. **Open Source vs. Commercial License**: One of the main differences between Dandelion and KrakenD is their licensing. Dandelion is an open-source API gateway, meaning it can be accessed and modified freely by anyone. On the other hand, KrakenD is offered under a commercial license, which may come with additional costs for certain features or support.

2. **Community Support vs. Professional Support**: Another significant difference is the support model provided by Dandelion and KrakenD. Dandelion relies on community-driven support, where users can seek help from forums and online communities. In contrast, KrakenD offers professional support options, including dedicated customer service and technical assistance, making it suitable for enterprises with specific requirements.

3. **Scalability and Performance**: When it comes to scalability and performance, KrakenD is known for its high performance and scalability capabilities, making it ideal for handling a large number of API requests efficiently. Dandelion, while still capable of scaling, may not offer the same level of performance optimization as KrakenD in high-demand environments.

4. **Features and Extensions**: Dandelion and KrakenD have different sets of features and extensions that cater to various API management needs. KrakenD, being a commercial product, may include advanced features such as API caching, rate limiting, and security protocols out of the box. Dandelion, being open-source, may require additional plugins or custom development to achieve similar functionalities.

5. **Ease of Use and Configuration**: In terms of ease of use and configuration, Dandelion is known for its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup process, which may appeal to developers looking for a simple solution. Conversely, KrakenD may offer more configuration options and customization possibilities, suitable for organizations with complex API requirements and specific integration needs.

6. **Deployment Options**: Finally, the deployment options differ between Dandelion and KrakenD. Dandelion can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, providing flexibility for organizations with varying infrastructures. KrakenD, being a commercial product, may offer additional deployment options such as managed services or containerized deployments for easier scalability and maintenance.

In Summary, Dandelion and KrakenD differ in their licensing models, support options, performance capabilities, feature sets, ease of use, and deployment options, catering to different API management needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dandelion
Dandelion
KrakenD
KrakenD

It is a semantic Text Analytics API. From text to actionable data, extract meaning from unstructured text and put it in context with a simple API.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

ENTITY EXTRACTION; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; ARTICLE EXTRACTION; CLOUD BASED SAAS
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
15
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
5
Stacks
59
Followers
10
Followers
158
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easy to install
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
WordPress
WordPress
Virtuozzo
Virtuozzo
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Dandelion, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope