Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Datadog vs Dynatrace: What are the differences?
Comparison between Datadog and Dynatrace
Datadog and Dynatrace are both leading companies in the field of application performance monitoring (APM) and observability. While they have similar goals, there are a number of key differences between them that set them apart from each other.
Ease of use: Datadog offers a user-friendly interface and is known for its easy setup process, making it a popular choice for organizations with limited technical expertise. On the other hand, Dynatrace is more comprehensive and feature-rich, but its complexity may require more technical proficiency to fully utilize its capabilities.
Deployment flexibility: Datadog provides a wide range of deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid cloud deployments. This flexibility allows users to choose the best option for their specific needs. In contrast, Dynatrace focuses primarily on a Software as a Service (SaaS) model, providing a cloud-based solution.
Monitoring capabilities: Datadog offers a broad range of monitoring capabilities, including infrastructure monitoring, application monitoring, and log management. It also supports a wide variety of technologies, platforms, and frameworks. Dynatrace, on the other hand, is known for its advanced AI-powered monitoring capabilities, which focus on providing deep insights through automatic root cause analysis and problem detection.
Scalability: Both Datadog and Dynatrace are highly scalable, capable of handling large volumes of data and providing real-time insights. However, Dynatrace is particularly renowned for its ability to scale effortlessly and handle complex distributed environments and microservices architectures.
Integrations: Datadog offers an extensive library of integrations with popular tools and platforms, making it easy to consolidate and analyze data from multiple sources. Dynatrace also provides a range of integrations, but it primarily focuses on its AI and automation capabilities to deliver insights and intelligent automation within its platform.
Pricing model: Datadog follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay based on the volume of data ingested and the features used. This can be advantageous for organizations with unpredictable or fluctuating workloads. In contrast, Dynatrace generally utilizes a subscription-based pricing model, which may be more suitable for organizations with stable and predictable workloads.
In summary, Datadog and Dynatrace both have their own strengths and are suitable for different use cases. Datadog offers ease of use and flexibility, making it a popular choice for organizations with limited technical expertise. On the other hand, Dynatrace is known for its advanced AI-powered monitoring capabilities and scalability, making it a preferred option for organizations with complex environments.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of Datadog
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)139
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations84
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Notifications41
- Custom metrics41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- AWS support7
- In-context collaboration7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cost4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Cute logo4
- Automation tools4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Best than others4
- Best in the field3
- Expensive3
- Good for Startups3
- Free setup3
- APM2
Pros of Dynatrace
- Real User Monitoring4
- Automated RCA4
- Out-of-the-box distributed transaction tracing3
- Built on massive industry expertise (since 2005)2
- AI-powered platform2
- Extensible via SDK2
- Digital Experience1
- Easy setup1
- Accelerate software delivery1
- Infrastructure Monitoring1
- Applications & Microservices1
- Application Security1
- Built on API-first design principles1
- Automatic instrumentathird generation full stack Agents1
- Analytics vMotion events detection Discovery Performanc1
- Automation1
- Business Analytics1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Datadog
- Expensive20
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
Cons of Dynatrace
- Application Security0
- Real User Monitoring0
- Infrastructure Monitoring0
- Applications & Microservices0
- AI-powered platform0
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Datadog?
What is Dynatrace?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Dynatrace?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Dynatrace?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+31
+22
+46+34+37+26
+44