StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. DeployBot vs Jenkins

DeployBot vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DeployBot
DeployBot
Stacks90
Followers92
Votes74
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K

DeployBot vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Key Differences between DeployBot and Jenkins

Introduction:

This article aims to compare and highlight the key differences between DeployBot and Jenkins, two popular continuous deployment tools.

  1. Deployment Process: DeployBot focuses on simplifying the deployment process with a user-friendly interface and intuitive setup. It offers an easy-to-use web-based dashboard where users can configure deployment settings without any coding knowledge. On the other hand, Jenkins is a highly customizable automation server that requires some setup and configuration expertise. It provides a lot of flexibility but might have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  2. Integration and Extensibility: Jenkins excels in its ability to integrate with numerous third-party tools and plugins. It has an extensive plugin ecosystem, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality to fit their specific needs. In contrast, while DeployBot provides integration with some popular services like GitHub and Bitbucket, its extensibility options are more limited compared to Jenkins.

  3. Job Configuration: DeployBot simplifies job configuration by providing a visual drag-and-drop interface, where users can define their deployment process steps. It allows for easy setup of various deployment methods, including FTP, SFTP, and more. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires users to define job configurations using code, typically in the form of a Jenkinsfile. This gives users more fine-grained control over the job setup, but also makes it less beginner-friendly.

  4. Scalability and Distributed Builds: Jenkins is highly scalable and can be easily configured for distributed builds across multiple machines, allowing for faster and parallelized builds. It can also handle large and complex pipelines with ease. DeployBot, while suitable for smaller projects, may not offer the same level of scalability and distributed build capabilities as Jenkins.

  5. Security and Access Control: Jenkins provides more granular control over user access and security settings. It offers a robust security framework that allows administrators to define specific user roles, permissions, and access control policies. DeployBot, while offering basic user access controls, may not provide the same level of advanced security features as Jenkins.

  6. Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available. Its popularity means that finding solutions to common issues or getting help from the community is relatively easy. DeployBot, while also having a community and support system, may not have the same level of resources and community engagement as Jenkins.

In summary, DeployBot focuses on simplicity and ease of use for the deployment process, while Jenkins offers more customization and extensibility options. Jenkins excels in its integration capabilities, scalability, and security features. Users looking for a beginner-friendly option with a visual interface may prefer DeployBot, while those seeking powerful customization and automation capabilities may lean towards Jenkins.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on DeployBot, Jenkins

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

DeployBot
DeployBot
Jenkins
Jenkins

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Manually deploy with a click in the app, automatically deploy on each push, or use deploy tags in a commit [deploy:production].;DeployBot gathers new and changed files from your repositories since the last deployment. You can even preview the changes first.;Files are uploaded, SSH commands are executed and deployment hooks are triggered. Everything is logged for you.;Your entire team can view release notes and optionally receive an email notification with details about the deployment status.;Environments overview;Deployments timeline;Deployment details: tickets, revisions & files
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
90
Stacks
59.2K
Followers
92
Followers
50.4K
Votes
74
Votes
2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Seamless integrations
  • 17
    Free
  • 10
    Rocks
  • 1
    Docker
Cons
  • 1
    Not reliable
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Integrations
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to DeployBot, Jenkins?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana