StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Deployer vs Docker Compose

Deployer vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
Deployer
Deployer
Stacks49
Followers74
Votes21
GitHub Stars10.9K
Forks1.5K

Deployer vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Deployer and Docker Compose

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Deployment Workflow**: Deployer is a deployment tool that focuses on executing tasks during a deployment process, providing flexibility and control over the deployment workflow. On the other hand, Docker Compose is more geared towards defining and running multi-container Docker applications, automating the process of starting and linking containers.
2. **Orchestration Complexity**: Deployer is designed to orchestrate complex deployment processes involving multiple servers, environments, and deployment strategies, making it more suitable for larger and more intricate projects. In contrast, Docker Compose simplifies the orchestration of containers within a single host machine or a cluster, targeting smaller-scale applications.
3. **Supported Technologies**: Deployer supports a wide range of deployment technologies such as SSH, SFTP, and Git, allowing for flexible integration with various platforms and services. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for Docker containers and primarily leverages Docker's capabilities for managing containerized applications.
4. **Environment Isolation**: Deployer enables the isolation of different deployment environments, ensuring that each environment is independent and maintaining consistency between development, staging, and production environments. Docker Compose focuses on isolating and managing containers within a specified environment, facilitating the localization and replication of application environments.
5. **Dependency Management**: Deployer facilitates dependency management by allowing the execution of custom scripts or commands before, during, and after deployment, enabling the configuration of dependencies and dependencies. In contrast, Docker Compose manages dependencies through the definition of container dependencies in the composition file, automating the resolution and initialization of interdependent containers.
6. **Scalability and Extensibility**: Deployer supports scalability and extensibility through the integration of custom deployment recipes, plugins, and configurations, enabling the adaptation of the deployment process to specific project requirements. Docker Compose offers scalability through Docker Swarm for orchestrating containers across multiple machines but has more limited extensibility compared to Deployer. 

In Summary, Deployer and Docker Compose differ in deployment workflow, orchestration complexity, supported technologies, environment isolation, dependency management, and scalability/extensibility capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Deployer
Deployer

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

-
Simple setup process and a minimal learning curve;Ready to use recipes for most frameworks;Parallel execution without extensions;Something went wrong? Rollback to the previous release;Agentless, it's just SSH;Zero downtime deployments;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
10.9K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
49
Followers
16.5K
Followers
74
Votes
501
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Pros
  • 8
    Simply to use
  • 7
    Easy to customize
  • 6
    Easy setup
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Yii
Yii
New Relic
New Relic
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Magento
Magento
Slack
Slack
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Symfony
Symfony
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Deployer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana