StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Deployer vs Jenkins

Deployer vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Deployer
Deployer
Stacks49
Followers74
Votes21
GitHub Stars10.9K
Forks1.5K

Deployer vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of DevOps, tools like Deployer and Jenkins play crucial roles in automating the software development lifecycle. Understanding their key differences is essential for choosing the right tool for specific project requirements.

  1. Deployment Process Management: Deployer focuses primarily on orchestrating deployment processes and tasks, ensuring efficient and error-free deployment of applications across various environments. On the other hand, Jenkins is a continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tool that automates the build, test, and deployment processes, offering more comprehensive automation capabilities beyond just deployment.

  2. Ease of Configuration: In Deployer, configuration and setup can be more straightforward and less complex, as it is specifically designed for deployment tasks. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires more effort in configuring pipelines, plugins, and integration with other tools to achieve seamless automation of the entire CI/CD pipeline, making it more versatile but potentially more time-consuming to set up.

  3. Scalability and Extensibility: Jenkins, being a widely adopted and open-source tool, offers a vast array of plugins and integrations with various tools and services, making it highly scalable and extensible for different project needs. Deployer, while robust for deployment tasks, may have limitations in terms of scalability and extensibility compared to the vast Jenkins ecosystem.

  4. Community Support and Documentation: Jenkins benefits from a large and active community of users and developers, resulting in extensive documentation, resources, and community support for troubleshooting, learning, and expanding its functionalities. Deployer, being more focused on deployment, may have a smaller community and resources available for support and troubleshooting.

  5. User Interface and Visualization: Jenkins provides a user-friendly web interface for configuring and monitoring CI/CD pipelines, with visualization tools for tracking build and deployment progress. Deployer, being more task-specific, may have a simpler interface focused on deployment tasks, but may lack the detailed visualization capabilities of Jenkins for the entire CI/CD process.

  6. Integration with Version Control Systems: Jenkins offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git, SVN, and others, facilitating automated builds and deployments triggered by code changes. While Deployer can also integrate with version control systems for deployment tasks, Jenkins' deep integration and support for VCS make it a more comprehensive CI/CD solution.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Deployer and Jenkins can help in selecting the right tool based on specific project requirements for efficient deployment and automation in the software development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Deployer

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Deployer
Deployer

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Simple setup process and a minimal learning curve;Ready to use recipes for most frameworks;Parallel execution without extensions;Something went wrong? Rollback to the previous release;Agentless, it's just SSH;Zero downtime deployments;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
10.9K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
49
Followers
50.4K
Followers
74
Votes
2.2K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 8
    Simply to use
  • 7
    Easy to customize
  • 6
    Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Yii
Yii
New Relic
New Relic
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Magento
Magento
Slack
Slack
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Symfony
Symfony
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Deployer?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana