DeployHQ vs Google Cloud Build

Overview

DeployHQ

Stacks24

Followers39

Votes0

Google Cloud Build

Stacks807

Followers207

Votes4

DeployHQ vs Google Cloud Build: What are the differences?

Integration with different platforms: DeployHQ focuses on deploying code to various platforms such as FTP, SFTP, Amazon S3, and more, making it versatile for different types of projects. On the other hand, Google Cloud Build is specifically tailored for building and testing code within Google Cloud Platform, which can limit its compatibility with other platforms.
Automatic triggering of builds: Google Cloud Build integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Source Repositories and GitHub, allowing for automatic triggering of builds based on code commits or other events. This feature streamlines the development process and ensures that builds are always up to date. In contrast, DeployHQ lacks this level of automation and requires manual initiation of deployments.
Scalability and customization: Google Cloud Build offers a high level of scalability and customization, allowing users to configure their build pipelines to meet specific requirements. This flexibility is especially useful for complex projects with unique build and deployment needs. DeployHQ, while efficient for smaller projects, may lack the same level of scalability and customization options.
Cost structure: DeployHQ offers a simple pricing structure based on the number of projects and users, making it easy to budget for small to medium-sized teams. Google Cloud Build, on the other hand, follows a usage-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed during builds. This can be more cost-effective for larger projects with fluctuating build requirements.
Containerized builds: Google Cloud Build leverages Docker containers to perform builds in isolated environments, ensuring consistency and reproducibility across different build stages. This approach enhances security and allows for easy management of dependencies. DeployHQ may lack this level of containerization, potentially leading to issues with build reproducibility and dependency management.
Support and documentation: Google Cloud Build benefits from extensive documentation and support resources provided by Google Cloud Platform, ensuring that users have access to troubleshooting guides, tutorials, and community forums. In comparison, while DeployHQ offers support through tickets and emails, it may not provide the same level of comprehensive documentation and community support.

In Summary, DeployHQ and Google Cloud Build differ in their platform compatibility, automation capabilities, scalability, cost structure, containerization approach, and support resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

DeployHQ	Google Cloud Build
A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.	Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.
Zero Downtime Deployments; Build Pipelines; Deployment Targets; Automatic Deployment; Deployment Templates Deploy Behind Firewalls; Powerful Integrations; Mobile App	Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
Statistics
Stacks 24	Stacks 807
Followers 39	Followers 207
Votes 0	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Container based 2 GCP easy integration Cons 2 Vendor lock-in
Integrations
Bugsnag Bitbucket New Relic Sentry GitLab GitHub Discord Honeybadger CloudFlare Rollbar	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to DeployHQ, Google Cloud Build?

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

Gaia

Gaia is an open source automation platform which makes it easy and fun to build powerful pipelines in any programming language. Based on HashiCorp's go-plugin and gRPC, gaia is efficient, fast, lightweight, and developer friendly.

Weaveworks Flux

It is the operator that makes GitOps happen in your cluster. It ensures that the cluster config matches the one in git and automates your deployments.

Related Comparisons

DeployHQ vs Google Cloud Build: What are the differences?

Integration with different platforms: DeployHQ focuses on deploying code to various platforms such as FTP, SFTP, Amazon S3, and more, making it versatile for different types of projects. On the other hand, Google Cloud Build is specifically tailored for building and testing code within Google Cloud Platform, which can limit its compatibility with other platforms.
Automatic triggering of builds: Google Cloud Build integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Source Repositories and GitHub, allowing for automatic triggering of builds based on code commits or other events. This feature streamlines the development process and ensures that builds are always up to date. In contrast, DeployHQ lacks this level of automation and requires manual initiation of deployments.
Scalability and customization: Google Cloud Build offers a high level of scalability and customization, allowing users to configure their build pipelines to meet specific requirements. This flexibility is especially useful for complex projects with unique build and deployment needs. DeployHQ, while efficient for smaller projects, may lack the same level of scalability and customization options.
Cost structure: DeployHQ offers a simple pricing structure based on the number of projects and users, making it easy to budget for small to medium-sized teams. Google Cloud Build, on the other hand, follows a usage-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources consumed during builds. This can be more cost-effective for larger projects with fluctuating build requirements.
Containerized builds: Google Cloud Build leverages Docker containers to perform builds in isolated environments, ensuring consistency and reproducibility across different build stages. This approach enhances security and allows for easy management of dependencies. DeployHQ may lack this level of containerization, potentially leading to issues with build reproducibility and dependency management.
Support and documentation: Google Cloud Build benefits from extensive documentation and support resources provided by Google Cloud Platform, ensuring that users have access to troubleshooting guides, tutorials, and community forums. In comparison, while DeployHQ offers support through tickets and emails, it may not provide the same level of comprehensive documentation and community support.

In Summary, DeployHQ and Google Cloud Build differ in their platform compatibility, automation capabilities, scalability, cost structure, containerization approach, and support resources.

DeployHQ vs Google Cloud Build

Overview