Django CMS vs Strapi

Overview

Django CMS

Stacks74

Followers199

Votes12

Strapi

Stacks720

Followers1.3K

Votes277

GitHub Stars70.2K

Forks9.2K

Django CMS vs Strapi: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Django CMS and Strapi, two popular content management systems (CMS). Both Django CMS and Strapi provide a comprehensive set of features for building and managing websites, but they differ in several important aspects.

Architecture and Technology Stack: Django CMS is built on the Python web framework Django and follows a monolithic architecture. It provides a well-structured and scalable approach, suitable for large-scale projects. On the other hand, Strapi is built on Node.js and follows a modular architecture. It uses a modern technology stack and allows developers to quickly build and modify APIs, making it a great choice for smaller projects or agile development teams.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Django CMS offers a more complex learning curve compared to Strapi. It requires understanding of object-oriented programming and familiarity with Django's concepts. Strapi, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly interface and a more intuitive content modeling and management system, making it easier to get started for developers with less experience.
Flexibility and Customization: Django CMS provides a high level of flexibility and customization options. It allows developers to create reusable content plugins, build complex page structures, and easily integrate with other Django apps. Strapi, while not as flexible as Django CMS, offers a flexible content modeling system and allows developers to extend its functionality through custom plugins and middleware.
Frontend Development: Django CMS has a strong focus on backend development and content management. It provides a basic frontend framework but requires more effort to build complex frontend experiences. Strapi, on the other hand, provides a headless CMS approach, separating the backend and frontend layers. It allows developers to build custom frontend applications using their preferred frontend frameworks like React or Vue.js.
Community and Ecosystem: Django CMS has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community. It has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. Strapi, although newer, has a growing community and ecosystem, with an increasing number of plugins and resources available.
Hosting and Deployment: Django CMS can be hosted on any web server that supports Python and Django. It can be deployed to traditional hosting platforms or cloud services like AWS or Heroku. Strapi, being a headless CMS, can be hosted on any platform that supports Node.js applications. It is easily deployable to cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.

In Summary, Django CMS and Strapi differ in their architecture, ease of use, flexibility, frontend development approach, community support, and hosting options. The choice between the two CMSs depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project, as well as the familiarity and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Django CMS	Strapi
It is user friendly and has a very intuitive drag and drop interface. It's built around the needs of multi-lingual publishing by default. Its lightweight core makes it easy to integrate with other software and put to use immediately, while its ease of use makes it the go-to choice for content managers, content editors and website admins.	Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.
LDAP authentification; Session management ; Scripting API	Files structure; Controllers; Filters; Models; Attributes; Relations; Many-to-many; One-to-many; One-to-one; One-way; Lifecycle callbacks; Internationalization; Plugin; Plugin styles; Policies; Global policies; Scoped policies; Plugin policies; Public assets; Requests; Responses; Routing; Role-based access control; Services;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 70.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 74	Stacks 720
Followers 199	Followers 1.3K
Votes 12	Votes 277
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Easy Integration 2 Better UX 2 Rich features 2 Secure 2 Drag and drop interface	Pros 57 Free 40 Open source 28 Self-hostable 27 Rapid development 25 API-based cms Cons 9 Can be limiting 8 Internationalisation 6 A bit buggy 5 DB Migrations not seemless
Integrations
Bootstrap React Angular	Twilio SendGrid Node.js Ruby PostgreSQL Gatsby Google App Engine Hugo Flask Apache Cordova Angular

What are some alternatives to Django CMS, Strapi?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

Django CMS vs Strapi: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture and Technology Stack: Django CMS is built on the Python web framework Django and follows a monolithic architecture. It provides a well-structured and scalable approach, suitable for large-scale projects. On the other hand, Strapi is built on Node.js and follows a modular architecture. It uses a modern technology stack and allows developers to quickly build and modify APIs, making it a great choice for smaller projects or agile development teams.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Django CMS offers a more complex learning curve compared to Strapi. It requires understanding of object-oriented programming and familiarity with Django's concepts. Strapi, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly interface and a more intuitive content modeling and management system, making it easier to get started for developers with less experience.
Flexibility and Customization: Django CMS provides a high level of flexibility and customization options. It allows developers to create reusable content plugins, build complex page structures, and easily integrate with other Django apps. Strapi, while not as flexible as Django CMS, offers a flexible content modeling system and allows developers to extend its functionality through custom plugins and middleware.
Frontend Development: Django CMS has a strong focus on backend development and content management. It provides a basic frontend framework but requires more effort to build complex frontend experiences. Strapi, on the other hand, provides a headless CMS approach, separating the backend and frontend layers. It allows developers to build custom frontend applications using their preferred frontend frameworks like React or Vue.js.
Community and Ecosystem: Django CMS has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community. It has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. Strapi, although newer, has a growing community and ecosystem, with an increasing number of plugins and resources available.
Hosting and Deployment: Django CMS can be hosted on any web server that supports Python and Django. It can be deployed to traditional hosting platforms or cloud services like AWS or Heroku. Strapi, being a headless CMS, can be hosted on any platform that supports Node.js applications. It is easily deployable to cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.

Django CMS vs Strapi

Overview