Docker Compose vs Google Cloud Container Builder

Overview

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Google Cloud Container Builder

Stacks177

Followers198

Votes0

Docker Compose vs Google Cloud Container Builder: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Compose and Google Cloud Container Builder are both tools used for managing and deploying containerized applications. Although they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

Ease of use: Docker Compose is designed for local development and provides an easy way to define and run multi-container applications. It allows developers to specify the services, networks, and volumes required for an application in a single YAML file. On the other hand, Google Cloud Container Builder is a CI/CD platform that automates the building, testing, and deployment of containerized applications. It integrates with other Google Cloud services and provides a more robust and scalable solution for managing containerized workflows.
Deployment flexibility: Docker Compose is primarily meant for local development and testing, running on a single host. It is well-suited for individual developers or small teams working on a local machine. In contrast, Google Cloud Container Builder is a cloud-based tool that can deploy containerized applications to a wide range of target environments, including Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Google App Engine, and other cloud providers. It offers more flexibility in terms of deployment options and can scale to handle larger production workloads.
Integration with cloud services: Google Cloud Container Builder integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Storage, Cloud Source Repositories, and Stackdriver Logging. This allows developers to leverage the full power of Google Cloud Platform (GCP) when building and deploying their applications. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is not tightly coupled with any specific cloud provider and can be used with any container runtime that supports the Docker API.
Build process customization: Google Cloud Container Builder provides a highly customizable build process through the use of build configuration files written in YAML or JSON. Developers can define their own build steps, specify dependencies, and leverage various build triggers and substitutions. Docker Compose, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and automates many of the build steps, making it easier for developers to get started quickly without having to define complex build configurations.
Pricing model: Docker Compose is an open-source tool and does not have any direct costs associated with it. It can be freely used on any machine that supports Docker. On the other hand, Google Cloud Container Builder is a cloud-based service and is billed based on the number of build minutes used. While it offers a generous free tier, usage beyond that may incur additional costs depending on the scale and frequency of builds.
Scalability and infrastructure management: Docker Compose is focused on managing containers on a single host and does not provide built-in mechanisms for scaling or managing infrastructure. It is up to the user to handle scaling and orchestration using additional tools like Docker Swarm or Kubernetes. Google Cloud Container Builder, on the other hand, is built on top of GCP's infrastructure and can take advantage of features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and managed Kubernetes clusters for easier scaling and management of containerized workloads.

In Summary, Docker Compose is ideal for local development and testing, while Google Cloud Container Builder offers a more robust and scalable solution for building, testing, and deploying containerized applications on a cloud platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker Compose, Google Cloud Container Builder

Michael

CEO at asencis Ltd

Jan 5, 2021

Needs advice

We develop rapidly with docker-compose orchestrated services, however, for production - we utilise the very best ideas that Kubernetes has to offer: SCALE! We can scale when needed, setting a maximum and minimum level of nodes for each application layer - scaling only when the load balancer needs it. This allowed us to reduce our devops costs by 40% whilst also maintaining an SLA of 99.87%.

272k views272k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose	Google Cloud Container Builder
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.	Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 22.3K	Stacks 177
Followers 16.5K	Followers 198
Votes 501	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Bitbucket GitHub Docker Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Google Cloud Container Builder?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Docker Compose vs Google Cloud Container Builder: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ease of use: Docker Compose is designed for local development and provides an easy way to define and run multi-container applications. It allows developers to specify the services, networks, and volumes required for an application in a single YAML file. On the other hand, Google Cloud Container Builder is a CI/CD platform that automates the building, testing, and deployment of containerized applications. It integrates with other Google Cloud services and provides a more robust and scalable solution for managing containerized workflows.
Deployment flexibility: Docker Compose is primarily meant for local development and testing, running on a single host. It is well-suited for individual developers or small teams working on a local machine. In contrast, Google Cloud Container Builder is a cloud-based tool that can deploy containerized applications to a wide range of target environments, including Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Google App Engine, and other cloud providers. It offers more flexibility in terms of deployment options and can scale to handle larger production workloads.
Integration with cloud services: Google Cloud Container Builder integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Storage, Cloud Source Repositories, and Stackdriver Logging. This allows developers to leverage the full power of Google Cloud Platform (GCP) when building and deploying their applications. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is not tightly coupled with any specific cloud provider and can be used with any container runtime that supports the Docker API.
Build process customization: Google Cloud Container Builder provides a highly customizable build process through the use of build configuration files written in YAML or JSON. Developers can define their own build steps, specify dependencies, and leverage various build triggers and substitutions. Docker Compose, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and automates many of the build steps, making it easier for developers to get started quickly without having to define complex build configurations.
Pricing model: Docker Compose is an open-source tool and does not have any direct costs associated with it. It can be freely used on any machine that supports Docker. On the other hand, Google Cloud Container Builder is a cloud-based service and is billed based on the number of build minutes used. While it offers a generous free tier, usage beyond that may incur additional costs depending on the scale and frequency of builds.
Scalability and infrastructure management: Docker Compose is focused on managing containers on a single host and does not provide built-in mechanisms for scaling or managing infrastructure. It is up to the user to handle scaling and orchestration using additional tools like Docker Swarm or Kubernetes. Google Cloud Container Builder, on the other hand, is built on top of GCP's infrastructure and can take advantage of features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and managed Kubernetes clusters for easier scaling and management of containerized workloads.

Docker Compose vs Google Cloud Container Builder

Overview

Docker Compose vs Google Cloud Container Builder: What are the differences?