Docker Compose vs Snap CI

Overview

Snap CI

Stacks29

Followers56

Votes100

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Docker Compose and Snap CI are two popular tools in the realm of continuous integration and deployment. Here are key differences between Docker Compose and Snap CI:

Deployment Environment: Docker Compose is primarily focused on defining and running multi-container Docker applications, making it ideal for setting up development environments. On the other hand, Snap CI is a continuous integration tool that helps in automating the build, test, and deployment processes of applications.
Configuration Management: Docker Compose uses a declarative YAML file to define services, networks, and volumes for Docker applications. In contrast, Snap CI provides a more code-centric approach by allowing users to define pipeline configurations using a domain-specific language (DSL) within the platform.
Scalability: Docker Compose is well-suited for small to mid-sized projects where container orchestration is necessary but does not require advanced scalability features. Snap CI, on the other hand, is designed to handle larger and more complex projects that require scalable build and deployment processes across multiple environments.
Integration with Git: Docker Compose does not provide native integration with Git repositories and relies on third-party tools for version control. In contrast, Snap CI offers seamless integration with Git repositories, allowing developers to trigger automated builds and deployments based on version control events.
Monitoring and Insights: Docker Compose lacks built-in monitoring and analytics capabilities, requiring users to rely on external tools for performance monitoring and insights into containerized applications. Snap CI includes features such as build logs, test results, and deployment history, providing users with visibility into the CI/CD pipeline's performance.
Community Support: Docker Compose benefits from a large and active community of developers and contributors, leading to frequent updates, bug fixes, and new features. Snap CI, while offering reliable support from the parent company, may have a smaller community presence, resulting in potentially slower response times for issue resolution and feature requests.

In Summary, Docker Compose and Snap CI differ in their focus on deployment environments, configuration management, scalability, integration with Git, monitoring capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Snap CI	Docker Compose
Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.	With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS;System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries;Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.;Multi-Stage Deployment Pipelines	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 36.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 5.5K
Stacks 29	Stacks 22.3K
Followers 56	Followers 16.5K
Votes 100	Votes 501
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Github integration 13 Easy setup 11 Multi-stage pipelines 10 Continuous deployment 9 Easy ui	Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Docker Slack Amazon EC2 GitHub Heroku	Docker

What are some alternatives to Snap CI, Docker Compose?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Docker Compose vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Docker Compose and Snap CI are two popular tools in the realm of continuous integration and deployment. Here are key differences between Docker Compose and Snap CI:

Deployment Environment: Docker Compose is primarily focused on defining and running multi-container Docker applications, making it ideal for setting up development environments. On the other hand, Snap CI is a continuous integration tool that helps in automating the build, test, and deployment processes of applications.
Configuration Management: Docker Compose uses a declarative YAML file to define services, networks, and volumes for Docker applications. In contrast, Snap CI provides a more code-centric approach by allowing users to define pipeline configurations using a domain-specific language (DSL) within the platform.
Scalability: Docker Compose is well-suited for small to mid-sized projects where container orchestration is necessary but does not require advanced scalability features. Snap CI, on the other hand, is designed to handle larger and more complex projects that require scalable build and deployment processes across multiple environments.
Integration with Git: Docker Compose does not provide native integration with Git repositories and relies on third-party tools for version control. In contrast, Snap CI offers seamless integration with Git repositories, allowing developers to trigger automated builds and deployments based on version control events.
Monitoring and Insights: Docker Compose lacks built-in monitoring and analytics capabilities, requiring users to rely on external tools for performance monitoring and insights into containerized applications. Snap CI includes features such as build logs, test results, and deployment history, providing users with visibility into the CI/CD pipeline's performance.
Community Support: Docker Compose benefits from a large and active community of developers and contributors, leading to frequent updates, bug fixes, and new features. Snap CI, while offering reliable support from the parent company, may have a smaller community presence, resulting in potentially slower response times for issue resolution and feature requests.

In Summary, Docker Compose and Snap CI differ in their focus on deployment environments, configuration management, scalability, integration with Git, monitoring capabilities, and community support.