Docker Swarm vs Kubecost

Overview

Docker Swarm

Stacks779

Followers990

Votes282

Kubecost

Stacks8

Followers32

Votes0

Docker Swarm vs Kubecost: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of container orchestration, Docker Swarm and Kubernetes (Kubecost) are two popular tools that help manage and scale containerized applications. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms is essential for choosing the right one for your deployment needs.

Architecture: Docker Swarm follows a simpler architecture with a master node managing the cluster, while Kubernetes has a more complex architecture with master and worker nodes, allowing for more granular control over deployments and scaling.
Scalability: Kubernetes is known for its ability to scale clusters faster and more efficiently than Docker Swarm. Kubernetes provides features like auto-scaling, which dynamically adjusts resources based on workload, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency.
Community Support: Kubernetes boasts a larger and more active community compared to Docker Swarm. This means that Kubernetes users have access to a wider range of resources, tools, and support when troubleshooting issues or seeking best practices for container orchestration.
Monitoring and Metrics: Kubecost offers advanced monitoring and metrics capabilities out of the box, providing insights into resource utilization, performance bottlenecks, and cost tracking for better optimization and management of containerized workloads.
Networking: Kubernetes offers a more powerful and flexible networking model compared to Docker Swarm. Kubernetes allows multiple levels of network isolation and integrates well with various networking solutions, making it more suitable for complex network configurations.
Deployment Complexity: Docker Swarm is generally considered easier to set up and manage, making it more appealing for small to medium-sized deployments with simpler requirements. On the other hand, Kubernetes's extensive feature set and flexibility come at the cost of higher complexity, requiring more expertise and resources for deployment and maintenance.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Docker Swarm and Kubernetes (Kubecost) is crucial for selecting the appropriate container orchestration tool that best fits your organization's needs and infrastructure complexities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker Swarm, Kubecost

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker Swarm	Kubecost
Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.	Created by a team of ex-Google cloud engineers / product managers that came together after seeing the challenges from managing microservice-based infrastructure at scale.
-	Cost monitoring; Cost allocation; Out of cluster costs; Infrastructure insights; Infrastructure reliability score; Notifications
Statistics
Stacks 779	Stacks 8
Followers 990	Followers 32
Votes 282	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 55 Docker friendly 46 Easy to setup 40 Standard Docker API 38 Easy to use 23 Native Cons 9 Low adoption	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Jira Slack PagerDuty

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm, Kubecost?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Docker Swarm vs Kubecost: What are the differences?

Architecture: Docker Swarm follows a simpler architecture with a master node managing the cluster, while Kubernetes has a more complex architecture with master and worker nodes, allowing for more granular control over deployments and scaling.
Scalability: Kubernetes is known for its ability to scale clusters faster and more efficiently than Docker Swarm. Kubernetes provides features like auto-scaling, which dynamically adjusts resources based on workload, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency.
Community Support: Kubernetes boasts a larger and more active community compared to Docker Swarm. This means that Kubernetes users have access to a wider range of resources, tools, and support when troubleshooting issues or seeking best practices for container orchestration.
Monitoring and Metrics: Kubecost offers advanced monitoring and metrics capabilities out of the box, providing insights into resource utilization, performance bottlenecks, and cost tracking for better optimization and management of containerized workloads.
Networking: Kubernetes offers a more powerful and flexible networking model compared to Docker Swarm. Kubernetes allows multiple levels of network isolation and integrates well with various networking solutions, making it more suitable for complex network configurations.
Deployment Complexity: Docker Swarm is generally considered easier to set up and manage, making it more appealing for small to medium-sized deployments with simpler requirements. On the other hand, Kubernetes's extensive feature set and flexibility come at the cost of higher complexity, requiring more expertise and resources for deployment and maintenance.

Docker Swarm vs Kubecost

Overview