Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker

174.8K
140.5K
+ 1
3.9K
Local by Flywheel

44
90
+ 1
3
Add tool

Docker vs Local by Flywheel: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker and Local by Flywheel. Both Docker and Local by Flywheel are commonly used tools for managing local development environments, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart.

  1. Architecture: Docker is a platform that enables developers to package their applications and their dependencies into containers, which can then be run on any system that supports Docker. On the other hand, Local by Flywheel is a local development environment specifically designed for WordPress sites, offering a simplified and user-friendly interface for managing WordPress development.

  2. Supported Technologies: Docker is a versatile tool that can be used to containerize applications developed in various programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. Local by Flywheel, as a WordPress-specific tool, is primarily focused on supporting WordPress development, providing features like automatic WordPress installation, local development server, and database management.

  3. Ease of Use: Docker has a steeper learning curve as it requires understanding of the command-line interface and Dockerfile syntax to build and manage containers effectively. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, offers an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the creation, management, and deployment of WordPress sites, making it more beginner-friendly.

  4. Portability: Docker containers are highly portable, meaning they can be easily moved or deployed across different systems and environments that support Docker. This portability allows developers to build once and run anywhere, making it easier to replicate development environments. Local by Flywheel, while it allows easy creation and management of WordPress sites, is less portable and limited to the Local by Flywheel environment.

  5. Workflow Integration: Docker is often favored in larger development teams or projects where a consistent development and deployment workflow across multiple developers or environments is desired. Docker provides tools for container orchestration, version control, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, is more suitable for individual developers or small teams working on WordPress projects, offering a simplified development workflow specifically tailored to WordPress.

In summary, Docker is a versatile platform for containerization, suitable for various projects and programming languages, while Local by Flywheel is a specialized and user-friendly development environment focused on WordPress development. Docker provides more extensive flexibility, portability, and integration options, making it ideal for complex projects and larger teams. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, offers a simplified and beginner-friendly experience specifically for WordPress developers.

Decisions about Docker and Local by Flywheel
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 457K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Docker
Pros of Local by Flywheel
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
  • 218
    Standardization
  • 185
    Scalable
  • 106
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 88
    Security
  • 85
    Private paas environments
  • 34
    Portability
  • 26
    Limit resource usage
  • 17
    Game changer
  • 16
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    Concurrency
  • 8
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Fast and Portable
  • 5
    Because its fun
  • 4
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 3
    Highly useful
  • 3
    It's dope
  • 2
    Package the environment with the application
  • 2
    Super
  • 2
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 2
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 2
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 2
    Its cool
  • 2
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 2
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 2
    HIgh Throughput
  • 2
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 0
    Asdfd
  • 1
    Optimized for Wordpress development
  • 1
    Superior user interface
  • 1
    Faster setup

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docker
Cons of Local by Flywheel
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Docker?

    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

    What is Local by Flywheel?

    It is a free local development environment designed to simplify the workflow of WordPress developers and designers. It makes creating a local WordPress site a light breeze. Any site created with it, will automatically have a self-signed certificate created.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docker?
    What companies use Local by Flywheel?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docker?
    What tools integrate with Local by Flywheel?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1161
    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2658
    Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

    Blue Medora

    DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
    11
    2380
    DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
    6
    2764
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    37421
    What are some alternatives to Docker and Local by Flywheel?
    LXC
    LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
    rkt
    Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Cloud Foundry
    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
    Vagrant
    Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.
    See all alternatives