Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Local by Flywheel: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker and Local by Flywheel. Both Docker and Local by Flywheel are commonly used tools for managing local development environments, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart.
Architecture: Docker is a platform that enables developers to package their applications and their dependencies into containers, which can then be run on any system that supports Docker. On the other hand, Local by Flywheel is a local development environment specifically designed for WordPress sites, offering a simplified and user-friendly interface for managing WordPress development.
Supported Technologies: Docker is a versatile tool that can be used to containerize applications developed in various programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. Local by Flywheel, as a WordPress-specific tool, is primarily focused on supporting WordPress development, providing features like automatic WordPress installation, local development server, and database management.
Ease of Use: Docker has a steeper learning curve as it requires understanding of the command-line interface and Dockerfile syntax to build and manage containers effectively. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, offers an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the creation, management, and deployment of WordPress sites, making it more beginner-friendly.
Portability: Docker containers are highly portable, meaning they can be easily moved or deployed across different systems and environments that support Docker. This portability allows developers to build once and run anywhere, making it easier to replicate development environments. Local by Flywheel, while it allows easy creation and management of WordPress sites, is less portable and limited to the Local by Flywheel environment.
Workflow Integration: Docker is often favored in larger development teams or projects where a consistent development and deployment workflow across multiple developers or environments is desired. Docker provides tools for container orchestration, version control, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, is more suitable for individual developers or small teams working on WordPress projects, offering a simplified development workflow specifically tailored to WordPress.
In summary, Docker is a versatile platform for containerization, suitable for various projects and programming languages, while Local by Flywheel is a specialized and user-friendly development environment focused on WordPress development. Docker provides more extensive flexibility, portability, and integration options, making it ideal for complex projects and larger teams. Local by Flywheel, on the other hand, offers a simplified and beginner-friendly experience specifically for WordPress developers.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Local by Flywheel
- Optimized for Wordpress development1
- Superior user interface1
- Faster setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3