Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Packer: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and Packer are both popular tools used in software development and deployment, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Docker and Packer.
Architecture and Purpose: Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and their dependencies into lightweight, portable containers. These containers can be run on any operating system with Docker installed, providing a consistent runtime environment. On the other hand, Packer is an open-source tool for creating machine images across multiple platforms. It allows you to automate the process of building images for different virtualization providers like Amazon EC2, Google Compute Engine, and more.
Build Process: In Docker, the build process involves creating a Dockerfile, which is a text file that contains a set of instructions for building a Docker image. These instructions define the base image, dependencies, environment variables, and other configurations needed for the application. Packer, on the other hand, uses a JSON template to define the build process. This template specifies the builders (e.g., AWS, Azure, VirtualBox) and the source image, along with any provisioning steps required.
Image Types: Docker builds and runs application containers, which are lightweight and efficient. These containers are isolated from the host system and can be easily deployed and scaled. Packer, on the other hand, builds machine images that can be used to create new instances (e.g., virtual machines) on various platforms. These images are typically larger and contain the entire operating system, software dependencies, and configurations.
Orchestration: Docker provides built-in orchestration capabilities through Docker Swarm or Kubernetes, allowing you to manage and scale containers across multiple machines. It also offers a centralized container registry (Docker Hub) for sharing and distributing Docker images. Packer, on the other hand, focuses on the creation of machine images and does not provide built-in orchestration. However, you can integrate Packer with other orchestration tools like Terraform or Ansible to automate the deployment and management of infrastructure.
Use Cases: Docker is widely used in applications that require fast, consistent, and isolated deployments, such as microservices architectures or containerized development environments. It is commonly used in DevOps environments for continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD). Packer, on the other hand, is primarily used for infrastructure automation and image creation. It is useful for provisioning new instances in cloud environments or creating virtual machines for development and testing.
Security and Isolation: Docker provides built-in security features like container isolation, resource limitations, and user namespaces to protect the host system and other containers. It also allows you to use custom security profiles and policies. Packer, on the other hand, focuses on creating images and does not provide built-in isolation features. However, you can use configuration management tools like Chef or Puppet in combination with Packer to apply security configurations and harden the machine images.
In summary, Docker and Packer are both powerful tools for software development and infrastructure automation. Docker is primarily focused on containerization and running applications, while Packer is specialized in image creation for various platforms. While Docker is commonly used for lightweight deployments, Packer is more suited for infrastructure automation and provisioning new instances.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Packer
- Cross platform builds27
- Vm creation automation9
- Bake in security4
- Good documentation1
- Easy to use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3