StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. DockerSlim vs kaniko

DockerSlim vs kaniko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

kaniko
kaniko
Stacks44
Followers79
Votes4
GitHub Stars15.7K
Forks1.5K
DockerSlim
DockerSlim
Stacks5
Followers23
Votes0

DockerSlim vs kaniko: What are the differences?

Introduction:

DockerSlim and kaniko are two popular tools used in the Docker ecosystem. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Build Context Handling: DockerSlim focuses on reducing the size of Docker images by optimizing the build context. It achieves this by analyzing the content of the build context to remove unnecessary files and dependencies, resulting in smaller and more secure images. On the other hand, kaniko is a tool designed for building container images without requiring privileged root access. It can be used in environments where Docker daemon operations are restricted, making it a more flexible solution for image building.

  2. Layer Optimization: DockerSlim optimizes Docker image layers during the build process to eliminate redundancy and improve image efficiency. By identifying and merging common layers, DockerSlim helps to reduce the overall size of the final image. In contrast, kaniko employs a single-layer approach, creating a more streamlined image build process without the need for layer optimizations. This can simplify the build process and make it easier to manage image versions.

  3. Security Features: DockerSlim includes security features that analyze Docker images and identify potential vulnerabilities. It can highlight security risks in the image content and suggest ways to mitigate them, helping to create more secure containers. While kaniko focuses more on the build process itself, without specific security analysis features, it benefits from being able to build container images without requiring privileged access, which can enhance overall security practices.

  4. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: DockerSlim integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, allowing automated image optimization during the build process. This streamlines the workflow and ensures that developers can easily incorporate image slimming into their existing pipelines. Kaniko, on the other hand, offers compatibility with various container registries for storing images, making it a suitable choice for deployment pipelines that involve multiple environments or cloud platforms.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: DockerSlim has an active community and comprehensive documentation that provides users with a wealth of resources for optimizing their Docker images. Users can benefit from community-driven plugins and tools that extend the functionality of DockerSlim for specific use cases. Whereas kaniko, as a Google-supported project, offers robust documentation and support within the Kubernetes ecosystem, making it a popular choice for users looking for Kubernetes-centric image building solutions.

In Summary, DockerSlim focuses on optimizing build context and image layers for smaller, more secure images, while kaniko provides a secure, single-layer build approach with flexible deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

kaniko
kaniko
DockerSlim
DockerSlim

A tool to build container images from a Dockerfile, inside a container or Kubernetes cluster. kaniko doesn't depend on a Docker daemon and executes each command within a Dockerfile completely in userspace. This enables building container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster.

Minify and secure Docker containers (free and open source). Don't change anything in your Docker container image and minify it by up to 30x making it secure too! Keep doing what you are doing. No need to change anything. Use the base image you want. Use the package manager you want. Don't worry about hand optimizing your Dockerfile. You shouldn't have to throw away your tools and your workflow to have small container images.

Build container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster
Free and open source; Secure Docker containers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
44
Stacks
5
Followers
79
Followers
23
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No need for docker demon
  • 1
    Automation using jules
Cons
  • 1
    Slow compared to docker
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
CentOS
CentOS
Alpine Linux
Alpine Linux

What are some alternatives to kaniko, DockerSlim?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana