StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. DokuWiki vs MediaWiki

DokuWiki vs MediaWiki

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Stacks72
Followers99
Votes0
MediaWiki
MediaWiki
Stacks178
Followers88
Votes0

DokuWiki vs MediaWiki: What are the differences?

Differences between DokuWiki and MediaWiki

DokuWiki and MediaWiki are two popular wiki platforms that serve different purposes and have distinct features. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Editing Interface: DokuWiki provides a simple and user-friendly editing interface with a WYSIWYG editor, allowing users to easily format their content using familiar toolbar options. On the other hand, MediaWiki uses a wiki markup language that requires users to learn specific syntax to format their content, making it less intuitive for beginners.

  2. Installation and Setup: DokuWiki is known for its easy installation process, as it does not require a separate database setup and can be run on any server without additional dependencies. In contrast, MediaWiki has a more complex installation process, requiring the setup of a database and other software requirements, which can be challenging for non-technical users.

  3. User Permissions and Access Control: DokuWiki offers granular control over user permissions, allowing administrators to define fine-grained access restrictions for individual users or groups. MediaWiki also provides access control features, but it has a more hierarchical permission structure, making it more suitable for larger organizations with complex user management needs.

  4. Collaboration and Versioning: DokuWiki provides built-in support for simultaneous editing, allowing multiple users to edit a page simultaneously without conflicts. It also offers a revision system that allows users to easily compare and revert changes. MediaWiki, on the other hand, does not support simultaneous editing natively and relies on third-party extensions for this functionality. MediaWiki's revision system, however, offers more advanced features, such as annotations and the ability to view differences between revisions in a visual interface.

  5. Extensions and Customization: DokuWiki has a limited number of plugins and extensions available, focusing on simplicity and lightweight functionality. However, it provides a flexible template system that allows users to customize the appearance of their wiki. MediaWiki, on the other hand, has a vast ecosystem of extensions and plugins, offering a wide range of additional features and functionalities, making it more suitable for complex and heavily customized wiki installations.

  6. Documentation and Community Support: DokuWiki has a well-documented wiki with extensive guides and tutorials on its official website, making it easier for users to find answers to their questions. It also has an active community of users who are willing to help newcomers. MediaWiki, being the software behind Wikipedia, has a massive amount of documentation available online, but it can be overwhelming for beginners. However, it has a large and active community, providing excellent support through forums and mailing lists.

In summary, DokuWiki is a user-friendly and lightweight wiki platform, ideal for small to medium-sized projects, while MediaWiki offers more advanced features and customization options, making it suitable for larger and more complex wiki installations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on DokuWiki, MediaWiki

Michael
Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceonConfluenceConfluenceGoogle DocsGoogle Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62.1k views62.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
MediaWiki
MediaWiki

It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.

It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

Statistics
Stacks
72
Stacks
178
Followers
99
Followers
88
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to DokuWiki, MediaWiki?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack