MediaWiki vs Microsoft SharePoint

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1
Microsoft SharePoint

+ 1
Add tool

MediaWiki vs SharePoint: What are the differences?


In this article, we will discuss the key differences between MediaWiki and SharePoint, two popular tools used for content management and collaboration.

  1. User Interface and Customization: MediaWiki provides a simple and straightforward user interface, with a focus on content creation and editing. It offers limited customization options for the interface. On the other hand, SharePoint offers a more advanced and customizable user interface, allowing organizations to design and create custom pages, workflows, and apps based on their specific needs.

  2. Collaboration and Teamwork: MediaWiki is primarily designed as a collaborative platform, allowing multiple users to edit and contribute to the content simultaneously. It provides version control and revision history features to track changes and revert to previous versions if needed. SharePoint, on the other hand, offers extensive collaboration features such as document co-authoring, task management, project timelines, and team communication tools, making it more suitable for complex teamwork scenarios.

  3. Content Organization and Structuring: MediaWiki focuses on organizing content in a hierarchical manner using categories and namespaces. It allows users to create interconnected pages using links and categories. SharePoint, however, offers a more structured approach to content organization by utilizing lists, libraries, and metadata. It provides the capability to define customized content types and tags, enabling better categorization and search functionality.

  4. Access Control and Permissions: MediaWiki has a relatively simple access control system, allowing users to define permissions based on user groups. However, it lacks granular permission settings for specific content or actions. In contrast, SharePoint offers a robust permissions management system, allowing organizations to define permissions at various levels, including sites, lists, libraries, folders, and even individual items. This provides more fine-grained control over access and enhances data security.

  5. Third-Party Integrations and Extensions: MediaWiki supports a wide range of third-party extensions and plugins, allowing users to enhance the functionality of their wikis. These extensions include features like multimedia support, social media integration, and advanced formatting options. SharePoint, on the other hand, integrates well with other Microsoft products and services, such as Office 365 and Azure. It also offers a marketplace for add-ins and apps, allowing organizations to extend the capabilities of SharePoint with the help of third-party developers.

  6. Scalability and Performance: MediaWiki can handle large amounts of content and high traffic, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. However, as the number of articles and users increases, the performance of MediaWiki may degrade. SharePoint, being a Microsoft product, is designed to handle enterprise-level scalability and performance requirements. It utilizes technologies like SharePoint Online and SharePoint Server to ensure reliable performance, even in large-scale deployments.

In summary, MediaWiki offers a simple and collaborative environment for content creation and editing, while SharePoint provides a more complex and customizable platform for collaboration, content organization, access control, and integrations. Each tool has its own strengths and is suitable for different use cases depending on the requirements of the organization.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of MediaWiki
Pros of Microsoft SharePoint
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Great online support
    • 1
    • 1
      Perfect version control
    • 1
      Stable Platform
    • 1
      Seamless intergration with MS Office

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of MediaWiki
    Cons of Microsoft SharePoint
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 2
        Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
      • 1
        User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is MediaWiki?

      It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

      What is Microsoft SharePoint?

      It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use MediaWiki?
      What companies use Microsoft SharePoint?
      See which teams inside your own company are using MediaWiki or Microsoft SharePoint.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with MediaWiki?
      What tools integrate with Microsoft SharePoint?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to MediaWiki and Microsoft SharePoint?
      The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
      Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
      It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.
      Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.
      It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.
      See all alternatives