Alternatives to MediaWiki logo

Alternatives to MediaWiki

Microsoft SharePoint, WordPress, Confluence, DokuWiki, and Drupal are the most popular alternatives and competitors to MediaWiki.
176
87
+ 1
0

What is MediaWiki and what are its top alternatives?

MediaWiki is a free and open-source wiki software that allows users to create and edit content collaboratively. It is widely used for creating wikis, documentation, and knowledge bases. Key features of MediaWiki include a simple and user-friendly interface, page version history, discussion pages, and the ability to organize content using categories and tags. However, some limitations of MediaWiki include a lack of modern design features, limited support for structured data, and a steep learning curve for beginners.

  1. DokuWiki: DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile open-source wiki software with features such as easy syntax, access control, and plugins. Pros include simplicity and scalability, while cons include limited design customization options.
  2. Confluence: Confluence is a collaboration tool by Atlassian that features team collaboration, document management, and integration with other Atlassian products. Pros include enterprise-grade features, while cons include a higher cost compared to other alternatives.
  3. Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware: Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware is an all-in-one free and open-source wiki-based software with features like forums, blogs, and file and image galleries. Pros include extensive features and customization options, while cons include a steep learning curve for beginners.
  4. Wiki.js: Wiki.js is a modern and feature-rich open-source wiki software with markdown support, real-time collaboration, and customizable themes. Pros include modern design and features, while cons include smaller community support compared to other alternatives.
  5. BookStack: BookStack is a simple and self-hosted wiki software with features like book creation, page permissions, and drag-and-drop organization. Pros include simplicity and clean design, while cons include a lack of advanced features compared to other alternatives.
  6. XWiki: XWiki is an open-source wiki software with features like structured content, applications, and a powerful scripting environment. Pros include extensibility and advanced features, while cons include complexity for beginners.
  7. Wiki.js: Wiki.js is a modern and feature-rich open-source wiki software with markdown support, real-time collaboration, and customizable themes. Pros include modern design and features, while cons include smaller community support compared to other alternatives.
  8. Gollum: Gollum is a simple, Git-powered wiki software that supports markdown and features a web interface for easy content editing. Pros include version control with Git, while cons include limited features compared to other alternatives.
  9. WikkaWiki: WikkaWiki is a lightweight and flexible open-source wiki software with features like extensibility, user management, and templating. Pros include lightweight and fast performance, while cons include a smaller user community compared to other alternatives.
  10. TiddlyWiki: TiddlyWiki is a unique and self-contained wiki software that runs entirely in the browser and features non-linear organization of content. Pros include portability and flexibility, while cons include limitations in collaboration features compared to other alternatives.

Top Alternatives to MediaWiki

  • Microsoft SharePoint
    Microsoft SharePoint

    It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Confluence
    Confluence

    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update. ...

  • DokuWiki
    DokuWiki

    It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki. ...

  • Drupal
    Drupal

    Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world. ...

  • XWiki
    XWiki

    It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management. ...

  • Markdown
    Markdown

    Markdown is two things: (1) a plain text formatting syntax; and (2) a software tool, written in Perl, that converts the plain text formatting to HTML. ...

  • Slack
    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

MediaWiki alternatives & related posts

Microsoft SharePoint logo

Microsoft SharePoint

426
7
Content collaboration for the modern workplace
426
7
PROS OF MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT
  • 3
    Great online support
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Perfect version control
  • 1
    Stable Platform
  • 1
    Seamless intergration with MS Office
CONS OF MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT
  • 2
    Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
  • 1
    User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned

related Microsoft SharePoint posts

WordPress logo

WordPress

97.6K
2.1K
A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
97.6K
2.1K
PROS OF WORDPRESS
  • 416
    Customizable
  • 367
    Easy to manage
  • 354
    Plugins & themes
  • 259
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 247
    Really powerful
  • 145
    Rapid website development
  • 78
    Best documentation
  • 51
    Codex
  • 44
    Product feature set
  • 35
    Custom/internal social network
  • 18
    Open source
  • 8
    Great for all types of websites
  • 7
    Huge install and user base
  • 5
    I like it like I like a kick in the groin
  • 5
    It's simple and easy to use by any novice
  • 5
    Perfect example of user collaboration
  • 5
    Open Source Community
  • 5
    Most websites make use of it
  • 5
    Best
  • 4
    API-based CMS
  • 4
    Community
  • 3
    Easy To use
  • 2
    <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
CONS OF WORDPRESS
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
  • 1
    Great Security

related WordPress posts

Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.6M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Shared insights
on
ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

See more
Confluence logo

Confluence

26.4K
202
One place to share, find, and collaborate on information
26.4K
202
PROS OF CONFLUENCE
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
CONS OF CONFLUENCE
  • 3
    Expensive license

related Confluence posts

David Ritsema
Frontend Architect at Herman Miller · | 11 upvotes · 715.4K views

We knew how we wanted to build our Design System, now it was time to choose the tools to get us there. The essence of Scrum is a small team of people. The team is highly flexible and adaptive. Perfect, so we'll work in 2 week sprints where each sprint can be a mix of new R&D stories, a presentation of decisions made, and showcasing key development milestones.

We are also able to run content stories in parallel, focusing development efforts around key areas of the site that our authors need first. Our stories would exist in a Jira backlog, documentation would be hosted in Confluence , and GitHub would host our codebase. If developers identify technical improvements during the sprint, they can be added as GitHub issues and transferred to Jira if we decide to represent them as stories for the Backlog. For Sprint Retrospectives, @groupmap proved to be a great way to include our remote members of the dev team.

This worked well for our team and allowed us to be flexible in what we wanted to build and how we wanted to build it. As we further defined our Backlog and estimated each story, we could accurately measure the team's capacity (velocity) and confidently estimate a launch date.

See more
Priit Kaasik
CTO at Katana Cloud Inventory · | 9 upvotes · 565.9K views

As a new company we could early adopt and bet on #RemoteTeam setup without cultural baggage derailing us. Our building blocks for developing remote working culture are:

  • Hiring people who are self sufficient, self-disciplined and excel at video and written communication to work remotely
  • Set up periodic ceremonies ( #DailyStandup, #Grooming, Release calls and chats etc) to keep the company rhythm / heartbeat going across remote cells
  • Regularly train your leaders to take into account remote working aspects of organizing f2f calls, events, meetups, parties etc. when communicating and organizing workflows
  • And last, but not least - select the right tools to support effective communication and collaboration:
  1. All feeds and conversations come together in Slack
  2. #Agile workflows in Jira
  3. InProductCommunication and #CustomerSupportChat in Intercom
  4. #Notes, #Documentation and #Requirements in Confluence
  5. #SourceCode and ContinuousDelivery in Bitbucket
  6. Persistent video streams between locations, demos, meetings run on appear.in
  7. #Logging and Alerts in Papertrail
See more
DokuWiki logo

DokuWiki

71
0
Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database
71
0
PROS OF DOKUWIKI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF DOKUWIKI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related DokuWiki posts

      Drupal logo

      Drupal

      11K
      360
      Free, Open, Modular CMS written in PHP
      11K
      360
      PROS OF DRUPAL
      • 75
        Stable, highly functional cms
      • 60
        Great community
      • 44
        Easy cms to make websites
      • 43
        Highly customizable
      • 22
        Digital customer experience delivery platform
      • 17
        Really powerful
      • 16
        Customizable
      • 11
        Flexible
      • 10
        Good tool for prototyping
      • 9
        Enterprise proven over many years when others failed
      • 8
        Headless adds even more power/flexibility
      • 8
        Open source
      • 7
        Each version becomes more intuitive for clients to use
      • 7
        Well documented
      • 6
        Lego blocks methodology
      • 4
        Caching and performance
      • 3
        Built on Symfony
      • 3
        Powerful
      • 3
        Can build anything
      • 2
        Views
      • 2
        API-based CMS
      CONS OF DRUPAL
      • 1
        DJango
      • 1
        Steep learning curve

      related Drupal posts

      Hi, I am working as a web developer (PHP, Laravel, AngularJS, and MySQL) with more than 8 years of experience and looking for a tech stack that pays better. I have a little bit of knowledge of Core Java. For better opportunities, Should I learn Java, Spring Boot or Python. Or should I learn Drupal, WordPress or Magento? Any guidance would be really appreciated! Thanks.

      See more
      Jan Vlnas
      Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 5 upvotes · 54.8K views

      Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

      There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

      If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

      If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

      Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

      See more
      XWiki logo

      XWiki

      19
      0
      The Advanced Open Source Enterprise Wiki
      19
      0
      PROS OF XWIKI
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF XWIKI
          Be the first to leave a con

          related XWiki posts

          Markdown logo

          Markdown

          21.7K
          960
          Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber
          21.7K
          960
          PROS OF MARKDOWN
          • 345
            Easy formatting
          • 246
            Widely adopted
          • 194
            Intuitive
          • 132
            Github integration
          • 41
            Great for note taking
          • 2
            Defacto GitHub lingo
          CONS OF MARKDOWN
          • 2
            Cannot centralise (HTML code needed)
          • 1
            Inconsistend flavours eg github, reddit, mmd etc
          • 1
            Limited syntax
          • 1
            Not suitable for longer documents
          • 1
            Non-extensible
          • 1
            No right indentation
          • 1
            No underline
          • 1
            Unable to indent tables

          related Markdown posts

          Vaibhav Taunk
          Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 4.2M views

          I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

          See more
          Johnny Bell

          For Stack Decisions I needed to add Markdown in the decision composer to give our users access to some general styling when writing their decisions. We used React & GraphQL on the #Frontend and Ruby & GraphQL on the backend.

          Instead of using Showdown or another tool, We decided to parse the Markdown on the backend so we had more control over what we wanted to render in Markdown because we didn't want to enable all Markdown options, we also wanted to limit any malicious code or images to be embedded into the decisions and Markdown was a fairly large to import into our component so it was going to add a lot of kilobytes that we didn't need.

          We also needed to style how the markdown looked, we are currently using Glamorous so I used that but we are planning to update this to Emotion at some stage as it has a fairly easy upgrade path rather than switching over to styled-components or one of the other cssInJs alternatives.

          Also we used React-Mentions for tagging tools and topics in the decisions. Typing @ will let you tag a tool, and typing # will allow you to tag a topic.

          The Markdown options that we chose to support are tags: a, code, u, b, em, pre, ul, ol, li.

          If there are anymore tags you'd love to see added in the composer leave me a comment below and we will look into adding them.

          #StackDecisionsLaunch

          See more
          Slack logo

          Slack

          119.6K
          6K
          Bring all your communication together in one place
          119.6K
          6K
          PROS OF SLACK
          • 1.2K
            Easy to integrate with
          • 876
            Excellent interface on multiple platforms
          • 849
            Free
          • 694
            Mobile friendly
          • 690
            People really enjoy using it
          • 331
            Great integrations
          • 315
            Flexible notification preferences
          • 198
            Unlimited users
          • 184
            Strong search and data archiving
          • 155
            Multi domain switching support
          • 82
            Easy to use
          • 40
            Beautiful
          • 27
            Hubot support
          • 22
            Unread/read control
          • 21
            Slackbot
          • 19
            Permalink for each messages
          • 17
            Text snippet with highlighting
          • 15
            Quote message easily
          • 14
            Per-room notification
          • 13
            Awesome integration support
          • 12
            Star for each message / attached files
          • 12
            IRC gateway
          • 11
            Good communication within a team
          • 11
            Dropbox Integration
          • 10
            Slick, search is great
          • 10
            Jira Integration
          • 9
            New Relic Integration
          • 8
            Great communication tool
          • 8
            Combine All Services Quickly
          • 8
            Asana Integration
          • 7
            This tool understands developers
          • 7
            XMPP gateway
          • 7
            Google Drive Integration
          • 7
            Awesomeness
          • 6
            Replaces email
          • 6
            Twitter Integration
          • 6
            Google Docs Integration
          • 6
            BitBucket integration
          • 5
            Jenkins Integration
          • 5
            GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
          • 5
            Guest and Restricted user control
          • 4
            Clean UI
          • 4
            Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
          • 4
            GitHub integration
          • 4
            Mention list view
          • 4
            Gathers all my communications in one place
          • 3
            Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
          • 3
            Easy
          • 3
            Easy to add a reaction
          • 3
            Timely while non intrusive
          • 3
            Great on-boarding
          • 3
            Threaded chat
          • 3
            Visual Studio Integration
          • 3
            Easy to start working with
          • 3
            Android app
          • 2
            Simplicity
          • 2
            Message Actions
          • 2
            It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
          • 2
            So much better than email
          • 2
            Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
          • 2
            Great interface
          • 2
            Great Channel Customization
          • 2
            Markdown
          • 2
            Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
          • 1
            Great Support Team
          • 1
            Watch
          • 1
            Multi work-space support
          • 1
            Flexible and Accessible
          • 1
            Better User Experience
          • 1
            Archive Importing
          • 1
            Travis CI integration
          • 1
            It's the coolest IM ever
          • 1
            Community
          • 1
            Great API
          • 1
            Easy remote communication
          • 1
            Get less busy
          • 1
            API
          • 1
            Zapier integration
          • 1
            Targetprocess integration
          • 1
            Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
          • 1
            Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
          • 1
            I was 666 star :D
          • 1
            Dev communication Made Easy
          • 1
            Integrates with just about everything
          • 1
            Very customizable
          • 0
            Platforms
          • 0
            Easy to useL
          CONS OF SLACK
          • 13
            Can be distracting depending on how you use it
          • 6
            Requires some management for large teams
          • 6
            Limit messages history
          • 5
            Too expensive
          • 5
            You don't really own your messages
          • 4
            Too many notifications by default

          related Slack posts

          Lucas Litton
          Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 322.1K views

          Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

          See more
          Jakub Olan
          Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 446.9K views

          Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

          See more