MediaWiki vs WordPress

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

MediaWiki vs WordPress: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MediaWiki and WordPress

  1. User Interface: MediaWiki is designed primarily for creating and editing collaborative content, such as wikis, and has a straightforward and uncomplicated user interface. On the other hand, WordPress is a content management system (CMS) that focuses on website development and blogging. It offers a more comprehensive set of features geared towards creating and managing websites, including customizable themes and plugins.

  2. Collaborative Editing: MediaWiki provides extensive support for collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to contribute to the same page simultaneously, with changes being tracked and easily reverted if necessary. WordPress, on the other hand, primarily focuses on individual content creation and is not specifically designed for real-time collaborative editing.

  3. Content Structure: MediaWiki organizes content hierarchically using a system of pages and categories. It allows for the creation of interconnected articles and facilitates the creation of a comprehensive knowledge base. WordPress, on the other hand, organizes content primarily through posts, pages, and taxonomies. The emphasis is more on structuring content for blog posts or traditional website pages.

  4. Permission and Access Control: MediaWiki has a robust permission management system that allows administrators to grant or restrict various actions and permissions to different user groups. WordPress also offers user roles and permissions but primarily focuses on roles for individual content creators and administrators. Advanced access control is possible with plugins but not inherent to the core system.

  5. Customization and Extensibility: WordPress provides a wide range of customizable themes and plugins, making it highly adaptable for various website purposes. Users can easily modify the appearance and functionality of their WordPress site through themes and plugins. MediaWiki, on the other hand, offers fewer customization options and may require more technical knowledge to modify the layout and functionality.

  6. Documentation and Support: As a widely used CMS, WordPress has a large and active community of users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. There are numerous resources available for troubleshooting and learning. MediaWiki also has a community but may have a more focused user base, primarily aimed at wiki-based projects.

In summary, MediaWiki is more suitable for creating collaborative content, such as wikis, while WordPress is a versatile CMS primarily focused on website development and blogging with extensive customization options and community support.

Decisions about MediaWiki and WordPress
Xander Groesbeek
Founder at Rate My Meeting · | 5 upvotes · 225.3K views

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

See more

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress:

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of MediaWiki
Pros of WordPress
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 415
    • 366
      Easy to manage
    • 354
      Plugins & themes
    • 258
      Non-tech colleagues can update website content
    • 247
      Really powerful
    • 145
      Rapid website development
    • 78
      Best documentation
    • 51
    • 44
      Product feature set
    • 35
      Custom/internal social network
    • 18
      Open source
    • 8
      Great for all types of websites
    • 7
      Huge install and user base
    • 5
      Perfect example of user collaboration
    • 5
      Open Source Community
    • 5
      Most websites make use of it
    • 5
      It's simple and easy to use by any novice
    • 5
    • 5
      I like it like I like a kick in the groin
    • 4
    • 4
      API-based CMS
    • 3
      Easy To use
    • 2
      <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of MediaWiki
    Cons of WordPress
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 13
        Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
      • 13
        Plugins are of mixed quality
      • 10
        Not best backend UI
      • 2
        Complex Organization
      • 1
        Do not cover all the basics in the core
      • 1
        Great Security

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is MediaWiki?

      It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

      What is WordPress?

      The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use MediaWiki?
      What companies use WordPress?
      See which teams inside your own company are using MediaWiki or WordPress.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with MediaWiki?
      What tools integrate with WordPress?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to MediaWiki and WordPress?
      Microsoft SharePoint
      It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
      Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
      It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.
      Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.
      It is a free wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. It is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument based document import/export, semantic annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.
      See all alternatives