Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MediaWiki vs WordPress: What are the differences?
Key Differences between MediaWiki and WordPress
User Interface: MediaWiki is designed primarily for creating and editing collaborative content, such as wikis, and has a straightforward and uncomplicated user interface. On the other hand, WordPress is a content management system (CMS) that focuses on website development and blogging. It offers a more comprehensive set of features geared towards creating and managing websites, including customizable themes and plugins.
Collaborative Editing: MediaWiki provides extensive support for collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to contribute to the same page simultaneously, with changes being tracked and easily reverted if necessary. WordPress, on the other hand, primarily focuses on individual content creation and is not specifically designed for real-time collaborative editing.
Content Structure: MediaWiki organizes content hierarchically using a system of pages and categories. It allows for the creation of interconnected articles and facilitates the creation of a comprehensive knowledge base. WordPress, on the other hand, organizes content primarily through posts, pages, and taxonomies. The emphasis is more on structuring content for blog posts or traditional website pages.
Permission and Access Control: MediaWiki has a robust permission management system that allows administrators to grant or restrict various actions and permissions to different user groups. WordPress also offers user roles and permissions but primarily focuses on roles for individual content creators and administrators. Advanced access control is possible with plugins but not inherent to the core system.
Customization and Extensibility: WordPress provides a wide range of customizable themes and plugins, making it highly adaptable for various website purposes. Users can easily modify the appearance and functionality of their WordPress site through themes and plugins. MediaWiki, on the other hand, offers fewer customization options and may require more technical knowledge to modify the layout and functionality.
Documentation and Support: As a widely used CMS, WordPress has a large and active community of users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. There are numerous resources available for troubleshooting and learning. MediaWiki also has a community but may have a more focused user base, primarily aimed at wiki-based projects.
In summary, MediaWiki is more suitable for creating collaborative content, such as wikis, while WordPress is a versatile CMS primarily focused on website development and blogging with extensive customization options and community support.
So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.
10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com
Pros of MediaWiki
Pros of WordPress
- Customizable416
- Easy to manage367
- Plugins & themes354
- Non-tech colleagues can update website content259
- Really powerful247
- Rapid website development145
- Best documentation78
- Codex51
- Product feature set44
- Custom/internal social network35
- Open source18
- Great for all types of websites8
- Huge install and user base7
- I like it like I like a kick in the groin5
- It's simple and easy to use by any novice5
- Perfect example of user collaboration5
- Open Source Community5
- Most websites make use of it5
- Best5
- API-based CMS4
- Community4
- Easy To use3
- <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MediaWiki
Cons of WordPress
- Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things13
- Plugins are of mixed quality13
- Not best backend UI10
- Complex Organization2
- Do not cover all the basics in the core1
- Great Security1