Confluence vs DokuWiki

Overview

Confluence

Stacks26.6K

Followers19.5K

Votes202

DokuWiki

Stacks72

Followers99

Votes0

Confluence vs DokuWiki: What are the differences?

Licensing: Confluence requires a subscription-based license, which can be expensive for organizations that require a large number of users. On the other hand, DokuWiki is free and open-source, making it more cost-effective for businesses with limited budgets or those who prefer self-hosted solutions.
User Interface: Confluence offers a more modern and visually appealing user interface with customizable themes and templates. In contrast, DokuWiki has a simpler and lightweight interface that focuses on functionality rather than aesthetics. This difference can appeal to users based on their preference for design.
Extensibility: Confluence has a wide range of plugins and integrations available in its marketplace, allowing users to extend its functionality with additional features. DokuWiki also supports plugins, albeit with a more limited selection compared to Confluence. Organizations with specific requirements may find Confluence's extensibility more suitable for their needs.
Collaboration Features: Confluence provides advanced collaboration features such as real-time editing, commenting, and notifications, making it suitable for teams working on projects simultaneously. DokuWiki, while supporting collaboration, lacks some of the advanced features found in Confluence, which could affect the efficiency of team collaboration in certain scenarios.
Security: Confluence offers enterprise-grade security features, including role-based access control, encryption, and compliance certifications, making it a preferred choice for organizations with strict security requirements. DokuWiki provides basic security features but may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve the same level of security as Confluence in enterprise environments.
Documentation Structure: Confluence uses a tree-like structure for organizing pages and content, which can be intuitive for users familiar with traditional documentation systems. In contrast, DokuWiki utilizes a flat-file system that stores pages as simple text files, offering a lightweight and easy-to-maintain documentation structure.

In Summary, the key differences between Confluence and DokuWiki lie in licensing costs, user interface, extensibility, collaboration features, security, and documentation structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Confluence	DokuWiki
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.	It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.
Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security	-
Statistics
Stacks 26.6K	Stacks 72
Followers 19.5K	Followers 99
Votes 202	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 94 Wiki search power 62 WYSIWYG editor 43 Full featured, works well with embedded docs 3 Expensive licenses Cons 3 Expensive license	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitLab Bitbucket GitHub Google Drive Balsamiq Jira Gliffy	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Confluence, DokuWiki?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Related Comparisons

Confluence vs DokuWiki: What are the differences?

Licensing: Confluence requires a subscription-based license, which can be expensive for organizations that require a large number of users. On the other hand, DokuWiki is free and open-source, making it more cost-effective for businesses with limited budgets or those who prefer self-hosted solutions.
User Interface: Confluence offers a more modern and visually appealing user interface with customizable themes and templates. In contrast, DokuWiki has a simpler and lightweight interface that focuses on functionality rather than aesthetics. This difference can appeal to users based on their preference for design.
Extensibility: Confluence has a wide range of plugins and integrations available in its marketplace, allowing users to extend its functionality with additional features. DokuWiki also supports plugins, albeit with a more limited selection compared to Confluence. Organizations with specific requirements may find Confluence's extensibility more suitable for their needs.
Collaboration Features: Confluence provides advanced collaboration features such as real-time editing, commenting, and notifications, making it suitable for teams working on projects simultaneously. DokuWiki, while supporting collaboration, lacks some of the advanced features found in Confluence, which could affect the efficiency of team collaboration in certain scenarios.
Security: Confluence offers enterprise-grade security features, including role-based access control, encryption, and compliance certifications, making it a preferred choice for organizations with strict security requirements. DokuWiki provides basic security features but may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve the same level of security as Confluence in enterprise environments.
Documentation Structure: Confluence uses a tree-like structure for organizing pages and content, which can be intuitive for users familiar with traditional documentation systems. In contrast, DokuWiki utilizes a flat-file system that stores pages as simple text files, offering a lightweight and easy-to-maintain documentation structure.

In Summary, the key differences between Confluence and DokuWiki lie in licensing costs, user interface, extensibility, collaboration features, security, and documentation structure.

Confluence vs DokuWiki

Overview