StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. DokuWiki vs Storyblok

DokuWiki vs Storyblok

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Stacks72
Followers99
Votes0
Storyblok
Storyblok
Stacks73
Followers126
Votes10
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

DokuWiki vs Storyblok: What are the differences?

Introduction DokuWiki and Storyblok are two popular content management systems used by businesses and individuals to create and manage their web content. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that users should consider before choosing one over the other.

  1. Hosting and Deployment: DokuWiki is a self-hosted solution that can be installed on your own server, giving you complete control over the hosting environment and deployment process. On the other hand, Storyblok is a cloud-based solution that manages hosting and deployment for you, allowing for easier scalability and reduced maintenance overhead.

  2. Content Structure: DokuWiki uses a structured and hierarchical organization of content using namespaces, pages, and sections. It offers granular control over how content is organized and presented. In contrast, Storyblok uses a component-based approach, where content is broken down into modular components that can be reused and rearranged easily. This allows for more flexibility in content creation and presentation.

  3. Collaboration and Workflow: DokuWiki offers basic collaboration features like user permissions and revision history, making it suitable for small teams or individuals. Storyblok, on the other hand, provides advanced collaboration and workflow management tools, such as real-time collaboration, content locking, and approval processes, making it more suitable for larger teams and complex content creation processes.

  4. Customization and Extensibility: DokuWiki is highly customizable through plugins and themes, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs. Storyblok, on the other hand, offers a more limited level of customization but provides a robust API and SDK for developers to extend the platform's functionality and integrate with other tools and services.

  5. Learning Curve: DokuWiki has a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and extensive feature set, requiring users to have some technical knowledge to effectively use the platform. Storyblok, on the other hand, is more user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for non-technical users to create and manage content without extensive training or technical expertise.

  6. Cost and Licensing: DokuWiki is open-source software with no licensing fees, making it a cost-effective solution for individuals and small businesses. Storyblok offers both free and paid plans, with pricing based on usage and features, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes but potentially more expensive for larger organizations with high traffic and content requirements.

In Summary, while DokuWiki offers more control over hosting and content structure, Storyblok provides advanced collaboration tools, customization options, and a user-friendly interface, making it a suitable choice for businesses looking for a cloud-based content management solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Storyblok
Storyblok

It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.

It is an api-based/headless CMS. Developers can define content-types and nested components to receive structured JSON and the editor can use a visual preview completely decoupled from the website itself. Its fields can fully be extended using Vue.js.

-
API-based; SaaS/Cloud-based; Media & File Management; Multiple languages & country; Localisation; Cross-platform delivery; CDN Caching; Image Optimizing Services; Whitelabel Interface; Custom SLA
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
72
Stacks
73
Followers
99
Followers
126
Votes
0
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Live Preview
  • 2
    GraphQL API
  • 1
    API-first
  • 1
    Flexible, transparent pricing
  • 1
    Granular permissions
Cons
  • 2
    No self hosting, only cloud with subscription
Integrations
No integrations available
Stitch
Stitch
Gatsby
Gatsby
Zapier
Zapier
DodgerCMS
DodgerCMS
WordPress
WordPress
Gridsome
Gridsome

What are some alternatives to DokuWiki, Storyblok?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack