.NET vs Iris

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.3K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Iris

Stacks84

Followers130

Votes16

GitHub Stars25.6K

Forks2.5K

.NET vs Iris: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: .NET is a software framework designed by Microsoft, while Iris is a web framework implemented in Go. .NET is a versatile platform used for developing various types of applications, while Iris focuses specifically on web development.
Community Support: .NET has a larger and more established community along with a vast number of libraries and resources available. On the other hand, Iris being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and a limited range of resources compared to .NET.
Language Support: .NET primarily uses C# as its main programming language, while Iris primarily uses the Go programming language. This difference in programming languages directly impacts the coding style, syntax, and development tools used in each framework.
Scalability: .NET provides a wide range of scalability options due to its vast ecosystem, including support for cloud services like Azure. Iris, being a lightweight web framework, may have scalability limitations, especially when handling heavy traffic or complex applications.
Learning Curve: .NET, being a feature-rich framework developed by Microsoft, may have a steeper learning curve compared to Iris. Iris, on the other hand, is designed to be simple, lightweight, and easy to learn for developers looking to quickly build web applications.
Performance: .NET, with its extensive ecosystem and optimizations, may offer more performance tuning options compared to Iris. However, Iris, being a lightweight framework built with performance in mind, may have better performance in certain web development scenarios.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET and Iris lie in their execution environment, community support, language support, scalability, learning curve, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Iris

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).
It's been around for longer.
it has better documentation and community.
One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.
Rail's front end support is starting to waver.
C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.
Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k

Comments

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Iris
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	The fastest web framework for Go.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 25.6K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 2.5K
Stacks 15.3K	Stacks 84
Followers 5.9K	Followers 130
Votes 1.9K	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft itself 8 Microsoft dependable systems 5 Hard learning curve	Pros 6 Fast 4 Easy to use 3 Almost real-time support to its users 2 Fluent API 1 MVC efficient
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	Golang

What are some alternatives to .NET, Iris?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Iris: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: .NET is a software framework designed by Microsoft, while Iris is a web framework implemented in Go. .NET is a versatile platform used for developing various types of applications, while Iris focuses specifically on web development.
Community Support: .NET has a larger and more established community along with a vast number of libraries and resources available. On the other hand, Iris being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and a limited range of resources compared to .NET.
Language Support: .NET primarily uses C# as its main programming language, while Iris primarily uses the Go programming language. This difference in programming languages directly impacts the coding style, syntax, and development tools used in each framework.
Scalability: .NET provides a wide range of scalability options due to its vast ecosystem, including support for cloud services like Azure. Iris, being a lightweight web framework, may have scalability limitations, especially when handling heavy traffic or complex applications.
Learning Curve: .NET, being a feature-rich framework developed by Microsoft, may have a steeper learning curve compared to Iris. Iris, on the other hand, is designed to be simple, lightweight, and easy to learn for developers looking to quickly build web applications.
Performance: .NET, with its extensive ecosystem and optimizations, may offer more performance tuning options compared to Iris. However, Iris, being a lightweight framework built with performance in mind, may have better performance in certain web development scenarios.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET and Iris lie in their execution environment, community support, language support, scalability, learning curve, and performance characteristics.

.NET vs Iris

Overview