ElasticBox vs Ploi

Overview

ElasticBox

Stacks8

Followers10

Votes1

Ploi

Stacks19

Followers35

Votes0

ElasticBox vs Ploi: What are the differences?

Introduction: ElasticBox and Ploi are both popular DevOps tools that offer various features to manage and deploy applications efficiently. However, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own way.

Scalability and Flexibility: ElasticBox allows users to easily scale their applications by providing a flexible and scalable platform that can adapt to changing workload demands. On the other hand, Ploi may offer limited scalability options compared to ElasticBox.
Automation Capabilities: With ElasticBox, users can automate their deployment processes, integrate with different tools and services seamlessly, and streamline their development workflow. In contrast, Ploi may have some automation capabilities but may not offer the same level of integrations and customization options as ElasticBox.
Cost Structure: The pricing model of ElasticBox may be based on usage, number of users, or specific features, providing flexibility for users to choose a plan that fits their needs and budget. Ploi, on the other hand, may have a different pricing structure that may not align with the budget or requirements of all users.
Containerization Support: ElasticBox may provide robust support for container technologies such as Docker and Kubernetes, allowing users to containerize their applications easily and manage them efficiently. In comparison, Ploi may have limited or no support for containerization, which can impact the deployment and management of containerized applications.
Community and Support: ElasticBox may have a strong community of users, developers, and resources that offer support, documentation, and help for troubleshooting issues. This can be beneficial for users looking to leverage community knowledge and best practices. Ploi, on the other hand, may have a smaller community or limited support resources available for users.
User Interface and User Experience: The user interface and user experience provided by ElasticBox may be more intuitive, visually appealing, and user-friendly compared to Ploi. This can make it easier for users to navigate the platform, understand the features, and perform tasks efficiently.

In Summary, ElasticBox and Ploi differ in terms of scalability, automation capabilities, cost structure, containerization support, community and support, as well as user interface and user experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ElasticBox	Ploi
Configure and deploy applications using CM tools like Docker, Chef, and Puppet. Your application is fully mobile across all major cloud environments because it’s decoupled from underlying cloud infrastructure.	Rapidly deploy any site you like - PHP, HTML and many, many more. You can use Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, 1-click-install WordPress or just SFTP.
deployment; development, instance management, collaboration; environment management; continuous integration; debugging; orchestrated application updates; configuration management integration	GIT support;Wordpress support; Laravel support; Nextcloud support; Digitalocean integration; Automatic database backups; Automatic file backups; Cronjobs management; Network management; Mysql management
Statistics
Stacks 8	Stacks 19
Followers 10	Followers 35
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Greate integration using Jenkins plugin	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub Elasticsearch Puppet Labs Chef Jenkins Ruby Rails MySQL MongoDB CouchDB	Forge WordPress Laravel ServerPilot CloudFlare phpMyAdmin OctoberCMS

What are some alternatives to ElasticBox, Ploi?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Related Comparisons

ElasticBox vs Ploi: What are the differences?

Scalability and Flexibility: ElasticBox allows users to easily scale their applications by providing a flexible and scalable platform that can adapt to changing workload demands. On the other hand, Ploi may offer limited scalability options compared to ElasticBox.
Automation Capabilities: With ElasticBox, users can automate their deployment processes, integrate with different tools and services seamlessly, and streamline their development workflow. In contrast, Ploi may have some automation capabilities but may not offer the same level of integrations and customization options as ElasticBox.
Cost Structure: The pricing model of ElasticBox may be based on usage, number of users, or specific features, providing flexibility for users to choose a plan that fits their needs and budget. Ploi, on the other hand, may have a different pricing structure that may not align with the budget or requirements of all users.
Containerization Support: ElasticBox may provide robust support for container technologies such as Docker and Kubernetes, allowing users to containerize their applications easily and manage them efficiently. In comparison, Ploi may have limited or no support for containerization, which can impact the deployment and management of containerized applications.
Community and Support: ElasticBox may have a strong community of users, developers, and resources that offer support, documentation, and help for troubleshooting issues. This can be beneficial for users looking to leverage community knowledge and best practices. Ploi, on the other hand, may have a smaller community or limited support resources available for users.
User Interface and User Experience: The user interface and user experience provided by ElasticBox may be more intuitive, visually appealing, and user-friendly compared to Ploi. This can make it easier for users to navigate the platform, understand the features, and perform tasks efficiently.

ElasticBox vs Ploi

Overview