1. **Customization**: Emacs is known for its extensive customization capabilities through Emacs Lisp, allowing users to tailor every aspect of their workflow. Vim also offers a high level of customization through its scripting language, Vimscript. On the other hand, gedit does not have the same level of customization options as Emacs and Vim, making it more straightforward and user-friendly for beginners.
2. **Modes**: Emacs has a unique feature called modes, allowing users to switch between different editing modes for various tasks such as coding, writing, or debugging. Vim also utilizes modes for different editing functions, providing a modal editing experience. In contrast, gedit does not have modes like Emacs and Vim, offering a more traditional single mode editing environment.
3. **Keybindings**: Emacs uses keybindings that are centered around its modifier key (Ctrl) and followed by commands, offering a vast array of shortcut combinations for efficient editing. Vim, on the other hand, focuses on a modal editing system with unique keybindings that make heavy use of the keyboard home row. In comparison, gedit has a more standard set of keybindings similar to most text editors, making it easier for users transitioning from other editing tools.
4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Emacs has a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions that enhance its functionality, with a package manager for easy installation of additional features. Vim also boasts a wide range of plugins available through its plugin manager, adding extra capabilities to the editor. In contrast, gedit has a limited plugin ecosystem, offering only a few extensions for basic functionalities.
5. **Learning Curve**: Emacs has a steep learning curve due to its extensive customization options and unique keybindings, requiring significant time investment to master. Vim also has a steep learning curve because of its modal editing system and non-traditional keybindings. In contrast, gedit has a more gentle learning curve, making it more accessible for beginners and casual users.
6. **Cross-Platform Support**: Both Emacs and Vim are cross-platform editors available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, gedit is primarily designed for GNOME desktop environments, limiting its availability on other operating systems.
In Summary, the key differences between Emacs, Vim, and gedit lie in their customization options, modes, keybindings, plugin ecosystems, learning curves, and cross-platform support.
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
Neovim can basically do everything Vim can with one major advantage - the number of contributors to the code base is just so much wider (Vim is ~100% maintained only by B. Mooleanaar).
Whatever you learn for Neovim you can also apply to Vim and vice versa.
And of course there is the never ending Vim vs Emacs controversy - but better not get into that war.
For a Visual Studio Code/Atom developer that works mostly with Node.js/TypeScript/Ruby/Golang and wants to get rid of graphic-text-editors-IDE-like at once, which one is worthy of investing time to pick up?
I'm a total n00b on the subject, but I've read good things about Neovim's Lua support, and I wonder what would be the VIM response/approach for it?
Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.
GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.
gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.
Content-sensitive editing modes, including syntax coloring, for a variety of file types including plain text, source code, and HTML.;Complete built-in documentation, including a tutorial for new users.;Full Unicode support for nearly all human languages and their scripts.;Highly customizable, using Emacs Lisp code or a graphical interface.;A large number of extensions that add other functionality, including a project planner, mail and news reader, debugger interface, calendar, and more. Many of these extensions are distributed with GNU Emacs others are available separately.
Full support for internationalized text (UTF-8);Configurable syntax highlighting for various languages (C, C++, Java, HTML, XML, Python, Perl and many others);Undo/Redo;Editing files from remote locations;File reverting;Print and print preview support;Clipboard support (cut/copy/paste);Search and replace;Go to specific line;Auto indentation;Text wrapping;Line numbers;Right margin;Current line highlighting;Bracket matching;Backup files;Configurable fonts and colors;A complete online user manual;A flexible plugin system which can be used to dynamically add new advanced features
Statistics
Stacks
27.9K
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
64
Followers
22.8K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
101
Votes
2.4K
Votes
322
Votes
48
Pros & Cons
Pros
347
Comes by default in most unix systems (remote editing)
328
Fast
312
Highly configurable
297
Less mouse dependence
247
Lightweight
Cons
8
Ugly UI
5
Hard to learn
Pros
65
Vast array of extensions
44
Have all you can imagine
40
Everything i need in one place
39
Portability
32
Customer config
Cons
4
Hard to learn for beginners
4
So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked